![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 273
|
Hi Everyone
Would like to know if the HDR effect is overdone. Going for the realistic look rather than surrealistic. Comments appreciated. ![]() ps. thanks to yapster for recommending this location ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
It almost looks like a digitally rendered image actually.
That aside, maybe go a teeny bit easier on the black point (i.e. push it back, not so much shadows) and it'll look more realistic. Now it looks ominous, stark, and slightly artificial. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,331
|
very nice, i think it is nicely controlled - but hey, the reds in the foreground somehow spoil the very strong moody mood here; and i think it is a wee bit oversharpened. the buildings are very close to looking a tad too much like they're "poppping out of the foreground" pop up book style.
i thought urban acid here would work fine too ![]() ![]() let me know if you want me to take it down, cheers. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20
|
__________________
meet me at flickr.com/photos/joelluo |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 273
|
Ya .. the chinatown shophouses roof gives a different mood. Your ubran acid is nice ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sometimes Singapore lol
Posts: 1,025
|
Maybe slightly less of the red shophouses and abit more of the sky, this pic is actually nice!
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sometimes Singapore lol
Posts: 1,025
|
By the way did u crop it?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West@SG
Posts: 2,517
|
I like the angle you are shooting from. Seems more balance. For my shot, the right seems to have be quite unbalanced cos of the missing shophouses roof. ![]() Only nitpick will be the noise and maybe a bit more crop on the left where you can see a buiding on the far side. Kinda distractiing. Haha, i can only recommend, but you took the effort to go and try out~
__________________
My Flickr Last edited by Yapster; 10th May 2008 at 10:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 273
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 273
|
Ya.. i shoudnt have been lazy - should have cropped the distracting building away. Barring the missing shophouses roof, your picture is still very nice - u using a wide wide angle ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,533
|
Rather flat for HDR. Yapster's pic example is more what HDR is about/to achieve: punchier in constrasts, more fine details - everywhere in highlights, shadows, etc; eg the cloud details in the sky, and leaves in the trees. If those are not what you are going for, then there is no need to do HDR, as the image as it is can be done with a single shot. HDR is more resource and time consuming. Don't you want more returns for more effort?
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 273
|
You are right, need to invest more time and energy ! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|