![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Choa Chu Kang
Posts: 166
|
Please give me your C&C on this picture. This bracelet is my mum and she did not maintain it well, so if you really look at it, it got dirt on the diamond's surface. Need comments on the composition, the approach etc.
![]()
__________________
EOS 40D | 17-40 F/4L USM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Is there a reason why the bracelet is abruptly cut off at the left of frame?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Choa Chu Kang
Posts: 166
|
Hi calebk,
I was using my 100mm macro. By itself, I can take the whole bracelet but with less detail of the diamonds. So I went ahead to use extension tubes of 12mm, 20mm, 36mm all together to give a 1.47x magnification. In this way I can take the diamonds to close up with alot of details. However the downside is I cannot squeeze the whole bracelet into the frame. So I decided to cut somewhere and I approached the subject with the perspective as seen above.
__________________
EOS 40D | 17-40 F/4L USM |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 292
|
hmm i think it would be nice if can be taken fomr a lower angle, like almost level with the front of the first diamond. almost like its "looking" back at you..
and use a glossly reflective surface... and .. erm use directed light to put a "sparkle" into the left most gem...to make it "smile" at you... my 2 cents =D
__________________
imPERFECT is GOoD Aspires to be a photographer & a director. =D Last edited by IsenGrim; 6th May 2008 at 10:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Choa Chu Kang
Posts: 166
|
Flash for this kind of super small things are a challenge. The options are two. Get the ring or macro flash or use the tent. I tried alot of way to make the diamond sparkle. One main reason is it is not maintain well (mum's fault =P), another is my lack of experience in photographing such small items with high reflective surfaces. If flash was used (which I tried), the diamonds reacted differently and got funny effects when I try to create the sparkles. Maybe u can share with me how to make them sparkle in a more controlled manner? Hmm for lower angle, what you say has a point, but I will compensate the part of the bracelet that has no diamonds. I did consider going low but the picture turns out to be not that nice compared to the one I posted here. Thats the challenge I faced.
__________________
EOS 40D | 17-40 F/4L USM |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Choa Chu Kang
Posts: 166
|
On the other hand, I really hope I can take all the diamonds nicely and sharp. But I cant afford the TS-E
![]()
__________________
EOS 40D | 17-40 F/4L USM |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,522
|
Oh wait, then you won't have diamonds to shoot ![]() How about if you have the diamonds parallel to the film plane, then tilt them with Photoshop? Or use a smaller aperture for more DOF then apply Gaussian blur to the rest of the bracelet? Or a combination of the two? Other than it being "cheating" and not being a particularly elegant solution (I like to get it right out of the camera too) can someone tell me why it can't work? I obviously haven't tried it myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Choa Chu Kang
Posts: 166
|
Thats my mum precious, if I sell them, she will sell my camera with my L lens. LOL! Anyway your method is good when the subject is in the same direction. In my case, I dun think you can PP until as good as TS-E as the subject is placed in a curve manner. Back to topic, any comments or advise to improve this picture?
__________________
EOS 40D | 17-40 F/4L USM |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,267
|
retake it. its reflecting something blue nearby.
you may want to bump up the contrast and darken the background to make the "sparkle" stand out.
__________________
chezburgr i can haz? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
I feel you should have gone for emphasis on the diamonds, over magnification. I would rather see a less abrupt composition with lower magnification. Even with high magnification, there should be a better way to ensure the fall off from your detailed portion is not so abrupt.
That said, I don't know how much magnification you'll get without the extension tubes, and I'm not sure if you'll get enough diamond detail. |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,522
|
Other than that I agree with the others who think it should look better with the whole bracelet. What's the blue, anyway? I thought it was part of the bracelet until psycho pointed out it could be a reflection. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Could be a blue light somewhere... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|