![]() |
|
|||||||
| Night Photography For those that like to expose in the dark of the night. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,225
|
![]() thunder and lightning, in the end.. no rain. zzzz |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,522
|
I don't know why your image failed to show up. Here's the link to it for others wondering "where's the image?".
http://www.igloophotography.com/gall...1/IMG_3968.jpg I saw the lightning and, unable to get a good view of the sky, ran out with my tripod and camera. The sky rewarded me with a spectacular lightning flash across the sky while I was setting up. And when I'm ready to shoot, all lightning activity stopped. In retrospect, running out when there's lightning may not be the most intelligent thing to do... |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,225
|
I shot this from my room. But after fixing everything up.. only manage to get this. the rest no luck. always miss it. LOL |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,522
|
I got a few, but not sure if it is worth posting (got to PP the raw files first, but at first glance nothing spectacular). Surprised you got such a good lightning capture at ISO 800 / f14. I shot at ISO 400, f4.5 (more than 2 stops faster, considering ISO and aperture) with my ultrawide and the lightning was not very bright. Had a hard time balancing blowing out the foreground and having the lightning bright enough, ended up with lots of 4 second exposures - major PITA.
Noticed that most of the lightning yesterday was cloud to cloud. Some of them were pretty spectacular. Best lightning I've shot was taken about 5 years ago without tripod on a point and shoot (stabilized on window sill). Pure dumb luck as I didn't know what I was doing ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Punggol
Posts: 155
|
NICE!!
Can I know what's the setting (i manage to find out your picture is iso 800, f14, 6s. What metering mode you using? Did you shoot in manual mode?). What lens are you using with your 5D? I took quite a while to set up my tripod too. manage to get a few and PS it. But it somewhat looks... I used ISO 800 too, but high noise. (mine is 350D). This is my 1st attempt on lightning. Can you please tell me what's wrong with my pictures? (Initially shoot with iso 100, but realise its too slow, then switch to iso 800) ![]() iso 100 f11 120s ![]() iso 800 f2.8 1/20s ![]() iso 800 f2.8 1/15s Thanks in advance. ![]()
__________________
Canon EOS 30D|BG-E2N|EF 50mm f1.8 II|EF 75-300mm f4-5.6|Tamron 17-50mm f2.8|420EX |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lentor
Posts: 459
|
![]() Hahaha here's mine took with a compact so... was waiting for like 1/2 an hour. Crazy.... took till my camera batt when out then a rainbow came out ![]() details are: Exposure:1/160 thats all :P |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,522
|
You managed to shoot lightning at 1/20 sec???
![]() Is there an emoticon for kowtow? I'm impressed. You're either very lucky, have killer reflexes, or you're shooting one heck of a thunderstorm. I haven't nailed shooting thunderstorms yet (not many thunderstorms in Northern California, and my current house doesn't have a great view of the sky). Next time I have a chance, I'm going to try shooting the foreground first, then use long exposure and high ISO for the lightning, and blend the two images together. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,522
|
Man, you another one. Do you just set the camera to click away until memory full / battery flat or do you wait for a lightning? I'd think that with most compacts the lag is so long that by the time you hit the shutter release, the lightning'd be gone.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lentor
Posts: 459
|
Haha that's why i took like 1/2 an hour to get it :P was sitting on my balcony just watching the stupid sky flash.... :P
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Punggol
Posts: 155
|
Guess this is beginner's luck. after shooting the long exposure shot (1st picture), realised that the lightning doesn't seem to be prominent. So I set it at f2.8, iso 800 and exposure -2 with multiple shots in aperture priority mode to give me 1/20s (beyond my control). Then anticipate when will the lightning come (very lucky for this series). I used shutter release for multiple shots before the lightning appear until it disappear (guess ther shld be 5 shots). These are wat I get. But I realised that after setting it at iso 800 and exposure -2, the picture is grainy when i use the raw conversion software or adjust the levels in PS CS2. I tried to play with curves, but guess i m really not good at tat. ![]()
__________________
Canon EOS 30D|BG-E2N|EF 50mm f1.8 II|EF 75-300mm f4-5.6|Tamron 17-50mm f2.8|420EX |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,522
|
I wasn't laughing, sorry it came across that way. Whether luck or skill, I was really surprised. I had enough frustration taking multiple 4 second exposures and ending up with lots of no-lightning shots to delete later (or, even worse, those where the lightning is blocked by other clouds, so you have a bright patch of sky but no clean lightning streaks). You must have given your camera a real workout!
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Punggol
Posts: 155
|
No problem. ![]() This is my 1st attempt. I realised that at iso 800, my pictures turn out grainy (noise). I'll use iso 400 max in future for low light condition (I always shoot at iso 100).
__________________
Canon EOS 30D|BG-E2N|EF 50mm f1.8 II|EF 75-300mm f4-5.6|Tamron 17-50mm f2.8|420EX |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|