ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Usergroup Discussions > IR/UV Photography

IR/UV Photography Seeing the world in a different light.


 
Thread Tools
Old 4th May 2008   #1
heheapa
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedok Reservoir, Singapore
Posts: 691
Default Modified Body vs IR filter

Other than faster explosure. Any difference in image quality with modified body vs IR filter, eg. B+W 093, Hoya R72, ...etc.

How about the cost difference? Thinking to convert my 30D (backup body) to IR. The 77mm IR filter seems not cheap as well ~200.

Thanks for advices.
heheapa is offline  
Old 4th May 2008   #2
night86mare
Senior Member
 
night86mare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,385
Default Re: Modified Body vs IR filter

should not have image quality differences.

costs - depends on the variety of lenses you use to shoot ir. if you use a lot of different lenses with different filter threads sizes, then it will possibly be more economical to convert to ir in the long run - due to the huge amount of ir filters you have to buy, and yes, 77 mm is very expensive. on the other hand, you lose the ability to shoot normal exposure with a body.

one thing to note - after conversion you cannot do long exposures. this can be desirable for flowing water.
__________________
Gallery | Dreamscapes 09
Pentaxian 伪君子之所以更可憎
night86mare is online now  
Old 4th May 2008   #3
heheapa
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedok Reservoir, Singapore
Posts: 691
Default Re: Modified Body vs IR filter

Thanks. I do have a 58mm IR filter for my G9 and I love it a lot. However, when it comes to Dslr, it's not easy for composition as the viewfinder is basically black out, and I seriously need a tripod with more than a trial to get a decent photo. Since my 30D sit in the dry cabinet most of the time, just think to convert it for IR hobby. Anyway, I think I will get a 77mm B+W 093 IR filter so that I can use my wide angle lens on that. And seems my 5D has better sensitivity than the 30D. hee....hee...... Thanks a lot!!!
heheapa is offline  
Old 5th May 2008   #4
rain-man
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 109
Default Re: Modified Body vs IR filter

Originally Posted by night86mare View Post
should not have image quality differences.

costs - depends on the variety of lenses you use to shoot ir. if you use a lot of different lenses with different filter threads sizes, then it will possibly be more economical to convert to ir in the long run - due to the huge amount of ir filters you have to buy, and yes, 77 mm is very expensive. on the other hand, you lose the ability to shoot normal exposure with a body.

one thing to note - after conversion you cannot do long exposures. this can be desirable for flowing water.
I use a modded Canon 5D and have done long exposures with it with adjustments to settings (ISO, aperture, shutter) or with ND filters added to it.
rain-man is offline  
Old 5th May 2008   #5
night86mare
Senior Member
 
night86mare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,385
Default Re: Modified Body vs IR filter

Originally Posted by rain-man View Post
I use a modded Canon 5D and have done long exposures with it with adjustments to settings (ISO, aperture, shutter) or with ND filters added to it.
oh yes, i forgot about nd filters.

thanks for reminding.
__________________
Gallery | Dreamscapes 09
Pentaxian 伪君子之所以更可憎
night86mare is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.06002 seconds with 7 queries