Just to add on.
1)You mention selecting a model base on her charisma which in ths context i believe technically equates to surfae skimming.
There is nothing mentioned about checking her background.
2)when it comes to photographer however,you have tons of reasons listed out to skip payment to a photorapher and even citing many other 'justifications' like "this is a photography community and people should share etc".
There are also more attacks on your part accusing many photographers as egoistic and engaging them doesn't mean they're up to par with their rate.
These 2 points that i concluded gave me enough reasonsto believe that they are biased.
And if you would like to know.
You are willing to pay a model and even begin selecting her by her "charisma".
The charisma here i believe equates to physical aspect and happily,there isn't any co-relation to her performances.
The proper way one should enage a model should be checking on her backgrounds.
When it comes to paying photographers, you went personal about their personality and even mentioned "even if you are a good photographer,doesn't mean others will pay you handsomely".
If someone can deliver work equal to what they qoute then who are you to argue?
so my displease is "why are you willing to engage a commercial model by'charisma' but yet attacking the personality of photographers when you are paying him/her to shoot the same.
I try to put it as objective as possible.
SN:I apologise if the word "you" appears to be confrontational because it was not meant to.=)