![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
|
Hi there,
like to hear some comments from the forum with regards to the 2 lens above. Which is a better lens to own?
__________________
40D, BG-E2N, 24-70L, 70-200L, 100-400L, EF-S 10-22MM, EF 100MM Macro, 580EX MK II |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bukit Timah / Melbourne CBD
Posts: 6,034
|
There are about 20 million questions asked here about these 2 lenses...... do a search...
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Malaysia/Singapore
Posts: 87
|
EF 24-70 F2.8L USM and EF 24-105 F4L IS USM are both good L zoom lenses.
I prefer F2.8 because i shoot in low light. Do a search |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bt Timah
Posts: 396
|
here we go again... ok in brief..
70 wins 105 cos 1 stop more 105 wins 70 cos much lighter 105 wins 70 for IS i using 70, considered 105 but decided against it after looking @ the sample photos that i took..
__________________
Canon: 1DMkII, 5DMkI, 2470f2.8L, 50f1.8, 70200f4L IS, 580EX http://www.flickr.com/jklightcapture |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rivervale
Posts: 1,401
|
according to your sig, you allready got 105. you're not satisfied with it?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West side of S'pore
Posts: 5,513
|
There should be a sticky made for these kind of threads.
Likewise for : 70-200 f2.8 IS vs 70-200 f4L 17-55 f2.8 IS vs 17-40 f4L 40D vs 400D Canon vs Nikon etc. Why ppl do not do bother do a search 1st, honestly I do not know. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 571
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|