ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Before Digital, Beyond 35mm > Medium Format

Medium Format The next step up from 35mm


 
Thread Tools
Old 14th March 2008   #1
monkeyjopaw
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 141
Default whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

whats the difference between an RB67 and 645? sorry. i currently own a digital slr system, and thought that a great way to diversify would be to go medium format.

help... anyone... please?
monkeyjopaw is offline  
Old 14th March 2008   #2
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,791
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by monkeyjopaw View Post
whats the difference between an RB67 and 645? sorry. i currently own a digital slr system, and thought that a great way to diversify would be to go medium format.

help... anyone... please?
both are using 120 film primary,
one is big, another one is small,
one is heavy, another one is light
one maximum film format is 6cm x 7cm
one maximum film format is 6cm x 4.5cm

more details, try Google
__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email
catchlights is offline  
Old 14th March 2008   #3
chngpe01
Moderator
 
chngpe01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,475
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

This is one of the many makers of med format.
http://www.mamiya.com/

Take a look at their product line at least you will have visual of them apart from what is given and of course google will reveal more info
chngpe01 is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 19th March 2008   #4
jamesong
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 311
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

RB67 was a studio camera until recently some young photogs like to use it for outdoor shoot really a heavy metal camera.( can use for enlarging your biceps ) Would recommend the Mamiya 7ii , a 6x7 rangefinder camera, very light weight and produces sharp and brilliant images.

The 645 is just slightly bigger than the 135 format( 35mm film ), imo , you don't really get the full impact of a medium format. You can start with 6x6 and go upwards.
__________________
My portfolio: http://www.singapore2view.com
jamesong is offline  
Old 19th March 2008   #5
enivre
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,692
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

The weight of the RB67 and additional lenses is really no joke. You really have to be very determined to use it outdoors. Trust me, I've tried..
enivre is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #6
Spectrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 3,685
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by enivre View Post
The weight of the RB67 and additional lenses is really no joke. You really have to be very determined to use it outdoors. Trust me, I've tried..
Yup...An average weight to carry this monster with 2 lenses is about 5 kg or more. Of course, that include 2/3 (6x7 or 6x4.5 format) film holders too. Have fun....
Spectrum is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #7
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,791
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

the Gitzo tripod in this photo here is for mounting the RB when go for location shoot.

the standard outfit for location shoot is three lenses, two bodies, one polaroid back, three 67 roll film holders, two 645 roll film holders, 5 or 6 pieces of filters, bellow lenshood, rubble lenshood for 50mm, at least 20 rolls of film.

in studio, I mount it on a Foba studio stand.

shooting with RB is not for fun.

__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email

Last edited by catchlights; 21st March 2008 at 01:24 AM.
catchlights is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #8
Spectrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 3,685
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
the Gitzo tripod in this photo here is for mounting the RB when go for location shoot.

the standard outfit for location shoot is three lenses, two bodies, one polaroid back, three 67 roll film holders, two 645 roll film holders, 5 or 6 pieces of filters, bellow lenshood, rubble lenshood for 50mm, at least 20 rolls of film.

in studio, I mount it on a Foba studio stand.

shooting with RB is not for fun.

Item #3 weigh at least 4 to 5 kg w/o the pan & tilt head attach to it (i think). Solid metal construction.

Last edited by Spectrum; 21st March 2008 at 01:38 AM.
Spectrum is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #9
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,791
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by Spectrum View Post
Item #3 weigh at least 4 to 5 kg w/o the pan & tilt head attach to it (i think). Solid metal construction.
well, need a tripod able to take the RB mounted with 250mm lens.
__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email
catchlights is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #10
Spectrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 3,685
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
well, need a tripod able to take the RB mounted with 250mm lens.
So, do you need to mount a support holder underneath the 250mm lens that attach to the camera body? Or that only applies to 350mm & above?
Spectrum is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #11
catchlights
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,791
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

250mm lens don't have to, never try the 350mm lens before, 250mm lens is mainly use for shooting portraits.
__________________
Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
www.foto-u.com | www.benjaminloo.com | email
catchlights is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #12
Spectrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 3,685
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
250mm lens don't have to, never try the 350mm lens before, 250mm lens is mainly use for shooting portraits.
Okie dokie...thks.
Spectrum is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #13
flipfreak
Member
 
flipfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,376
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

ok. so it seems bringing a rb67 and shooting handheld seems out of the qns then. hw abt the 645 mamiyas? possible to shoot handheld right?
__________________
My Portfolio | My Blog
flipfreak is online now  
Old 21st March 2008   #14
nmk
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 332
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

The Mamiya 645 can be shot hand held (though A tripod would really help if you plan to do any outdoor shooting in the evening or twilight).

If you are planning to use th 645 hand held, try and use a waist level finder and a small hand held meter (using a prism finder adds 50% or so to the weight of the body and the 80mm lens).

The Mamiya RB67 is not portable, but if you are willing to lug it around, it is a lot of fun to work with.

Last edited by nmk; 21st March 2008 at 04:49 PM. Reason: typo
nmk is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #15
Shiro MS08th
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,046
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Just to share the handling and feel of a 645 camera.
I'm using a Pentax 645N, size is about a pro-slr or slightly bigger, there's also a power-winder grip.
Overall I think weights around 1kg+ the most with 6xAA batteries.
Definitely able to handheld, and Pentax medium format cameras are pretty good for value.
Cons is, you can't interchange backs, if you need this function guess you have to look at Mamiya, not sure Bronica ones are able or not.
But some of their AF lens are rare to come by, in ebay that is.
Still hunting for the AF 150mm f/2.8 for few months already.
__________________
deviantART | Flickr
Shiro MS08th is offline  
Old 21st March 2008   #16
enivre
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,692
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by flipfreak View Post
ok. so it seems bringing a rb67 and shooting handheld seems out of the qns then. hw abt the 645 mamiyas? possible to shoot handheld right?
Not out of the question, just very tedious and bulky. I've brought it overseas to shoot street photography before. No joke.
enivre is offline  
Old 22nd March 2008   #17
cullenjeremy
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: East side massive
Posts: 301
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

hahahhahhhaa but the photos uh. awesome siakkk hahhaha
cullenjeremy is offline  
Old 22nd March 2008   #18
nmk
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 332
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by Shiro MS08th View Post
But some of their AF lens are rare to come by, in ebay that is.
Still hunting for the AF 150mm f/2.8 for few months already.
1) AF lenses for Medium Format cameras are not as good as AF on your average 35mm (my experience with the Mamiya 645AF. Please correct me if I am wrong).
2) Medium Format photography is largely a manual focus space and some of the best lenses and cameras will be available in manual focus only.
nmk is offline  
Old 22nd March 2008   #19
Shiro MS08th
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,046
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by nmk View Post
1) AF lenses for Medium Format cameras are not as good as AF on your average 35mm (my experience with the Mamiya 645AF. Please correct me if I am wrong).
2) Medium Format photography is largely a manual focus space and some of the best lenses and cameras will be available in manual focus only.
Well you are most probably right I guess, since I only have and use Pentax 645N before only, so no experience with other system and lens.
Just a beginner and learning from others and surfing the net.
But I read review for the AF 150mm f/2.8 lens, most people say it's the same or even better than the MF 150mm f/3.5 version, and I like a bigger aperture, since I use this camera mainly for handheld outdoor/street shoots, not for studio currently.
__________________
deviantART | Flickr
Shiro MS08th is offline  
Old 22nd March 2008   #20
flipfreak
Member
 
flipfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,376
Default Re: whats the difference between an RB67 and 645?

Originally Posted by nmk View Post
The Mamiya 645 can be shot hand held (though A tripod would really help if you plan to do any outdoor shooting in the evening or twilight).

If you are planning to use th 645 hand held, try and use a waist level finder and a small hand held meter (using a prism finder adds 50% or so to the weight of the body and the 80mm lens).

The Mamiya RB67 is not portable, but if you are willing to lug it around, it is a lot of fun to work with.
i'm actually pretty confused by the variants of the mamiya 645 and 67 around. the price seems to differ so much. seems like one can't get the 645 afd ii just for shooting film right? cos cathay is offering it free with a purchase of the digital back.
__________________
My Portfolio | My Blog
flipfreak is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.13306 seconds with 7 queries