Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 155

Thread: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

  1. #81

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    If you do some searching you will know that these " Gillian Chung" wannabes are doing all these lingerie shoots with some shooters, .....
    WHY?
    I dont think they are too concerned with the money (anyway the amount is not really that much) but I suspect only certain category of photographers (someone names DP ) are lucky enough to have the cake and eat it mostly TFP (time for photos).
    1. kaochye good (include some uncles, etc...) and those sweet-talkers (some of them even as5-kisses on the forum) ....
    2. young, yendao-looking
    3. those self-advertised "artistic" photographers
    One category i am quite sure will not be entertained by these SYTs are those with "cheehong-infested" reputation ....
    So guys, if you wanna shoot cheap lingerie virgins, pay more attention to 1,2,3.
    always the Light, .... always.

  2. #82
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Pacman's Corner
    Posts
    406

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Canonised View Post
    If you do some searching you will know that these " Gillian Chung" wannabes are doing all these lingerie shoots with some shooters, .....
    WHY?
    I dont think they are too concerned with the money (anyway the amount is not really that much) but I suspect only certain category of photographers (someone names DP ) are lucky enough to have the cake and eat it mostly TFP (time for photos).
    1. kaochye good (include some uncles, etc...) and those sweet-talkers (some of them even as5-kisses on the forum) ....
    2. young, yendao-looking
    3. those self-advertised "artistic" photographers
    One category i am quite sure will not be entertained by these SYTs are those with "cheehong-infested" reputation ....
    So guys, if you wanna shoot cheap lingerie virgins, pay more attention to 1,2,3.
    OT: whats kaochye? yendao? cheehong?

  3. #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Deep Deep in the sea
    Posts
    3,409

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by patch17 View Post
    big breasts were a significant factor in selecting a mate. they were believed to be a symbol of fertility.
    i thought it was suppose to be big butts? since when big breast were a symbol of fertility?

  4. #84
    Senior Member Sion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    新天地
    Posts
    4,768

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Canonised View Post
    One category i am quite sure will not be entertained by these SYTs are those with "cheehong-infested" reputation.
    Maybe they don't wanna to shoot SYTs?

  5. #85
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Clementi
    Posts
    10,596

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Sion View Post
    Maybe they don't wanna to shoot SYTs?
    Maybe some wanna shoot them:


  6. #86

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by lovells19 View Post
    i thought it was suppose to be big butts? since when big breast were a symbol of fertility?
    Grandma' story --- big Butt
    Grandpa' story --- big Boobs
    always the Light, .... always.

  7. #87
    Senior Member Sion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    新天地
    Posts
    4,768

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Canonised View Post
    If you do some searching you will know that these " Gillian Chung" wannabes are doing all these lingerie shoots with some shooters, .....
    WHY?
    I dont think they are too concerned with the money (anyway the amount is not really that much) but I suspect only certain category of photographers (someone names DP ) are lucky enough to have the cake and eat it mostly TFP (time for photos).
    1. kaochye good (include some uncles, etc...) and those sweet-talkers (some of them even as5-kisses on the forum) ....
    2. young, yendao-looking
    3. those self-advertised "artistic" photographers
    One category i am quite sure will not be entertained by these SYTs are those with "cheehong-infested" reputation ....
    So guys, if you wanna shoot cheap lingerie virgins, pay more attention to 1,2,3.
    The Master has spoken.

    With depth and width of personal knowledge and experience.

  8. #88

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Sion View Post
    The Master has spoken.

    With depth and width of personal knowledge and experience.
    grasshopper, .... if you want the worldly truths, be calm, and the answers are all over you ......
    always the Light, .... always.

  9. #89
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New York, Singapore
    Posts
    1,513

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    if you have depth and width, the girls will be crazy over you. i think. i dunno i'm still a virgin.

    i haven't heard of big breasts being a sign of fertility. if anything. big breasts are bad for the baby when breast-feeding because they actually suffocate the baby, and make it hard for the baby to latch on to the nipples. why? stick a raisin on a soccer ball, then try sucking on it. difficult right? nose pain.
    www.colouredshots.com
    Kodak film disposable camera

  10. #90
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dengue Town
    Posts
    98

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by antacid View Post
    i haven't heard of big breasts being a sign of fertility. if anything. big breasts are bad for the baby when breast-feeding because they actually suffocate the baby, and make it hard for the baby to latch on to the nipples. why? stick a raisin on a soccer ball, then try sucking on it. difficult right? nose pain.
    No lah, bewbie is softer then chestplate. am sure this analogy not right =)

  11. #91
    Member patch17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    728

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by lovells19 View Post
    i thought it was suppose to be big butts? since when big breast were a symbol of fertility?
    The Venus of Willendorf
    Today is a gift; that's why it's called the present.
    The toys

  12. #92

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by night86mare View Post
    ok i will teach you something useful then

    this is how meerkats show affection and love for each other



    now you know what they are doing!
    wahahahaha! that fella look damn smug some more

  13. #93

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by lovells19 View Post
    its really how the model carries the breast thats important..

    if you're going for breast shapes and sizes its more like porn..
    why would it be like porn?

  14. #94

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by antacid View Post
    if you have depth and width, the girls will be crazy over you. i think. i dunno i'm still a virgin.

    i haven't heard of big breasts being a sign of fertility. if anything. big breasts are bad for the baby when breast-feeding because they actually suffocate the baby, and make it hard for the baby to latch on to the nipples. why? stick a raisin on a soccer ball, then try sucking on it. difficult right? nose pain.
    big breasts means more fats...usually nice and soft and should be easier to feed the baby....unless of cos too big until mother can't even see the baby

  15. #95
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Outside the Dry Box.
    Posts
    16,268

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by madmacs View Post
    big breasts means more fats...usually nice and soft and should be easier to feed the baby....unless of cos too big until mother can't even see the baby
    uncle mac... tis guy got no idea lah... dun say raisin, how to blow up a ball if its going to obstruct the nose?
    Logging Off. "You have 2,631 messages stored, of a total 400 allowed." don't PM me.

  16. #96

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    you guys really crack me up.

    thanks for the after lunch stomach exercise.

  17. #97

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Del_CtrlnoAlt View Post
    uncle mac... tis guy got no idea lah... dun say raisin, how to blow up a ball if its going to obstruct the nose?
    you have a point....i think if the nipple like raisin might be a bit hard for the baby to latch on. a grape would be better

  18. #98
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Deep Deep in the sea
    Posts
    3,409

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by madmacs View Post
    why would it be like porn?
    bcos it attracts the tikopehs!

  19. #99
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Deep Deep in the sea
    Posts
    3,409

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by patch17 View Post
    omg.. reminds me of the beaches in phuket!

  20. #100

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    BTW, it is officially Kiddie Open Season now!

    Just saw a thread posted with the sentence "since the school holidays are here"...

Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •