Page 1 of 8 1236 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 155

Thread: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

  1. #1

    Default NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    recently, i was helping my friend who doesnt surf CS to look for potential lingerie models.
    came across one at services provided, emailed her....and she told me she doesnt do lingerie.

    i went back to her thread again and this is what i read.

    Started out modelling not long ago.
    But I'm keen in trying out different themes & things that are out of the box.

    Age: 18
    Height/Weight: 168cm/48kg
    Vital Stats: 36C 24 33

    Open to Fashion/Casual/Clubbing/Bikini Wear.

    Will only be doing TFCD/Lingerie upon consideration. (Creative & very different works)


    when i query her, this was her reply....



    Firstly, my rates for Lingerie are high and I don't do it unless the photographer's work appeal to me and also, if I'm comfortable with him/her. If you've read my thread carefully, I did stated NO Lingerie and Nude.


    so, why the discrepancy?
    will ONLY do IF rates are high?how high?how sure is she that her client wouldnt pay?and how sure was she that my friend's works aint 'creative' enough for her?she didnt even ask to look at his portfo.


    so those stories about kids on holidays coming to CS to make a quick buck is true????
    i'm speechless.

    Last edited by jeanie; 5th March 2008 at 04:28 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Punggol 21
    Posts
    967

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    It's a binding advert, you can try CASE or legal way...
    I lup SG, but SG don't love me...

  3. #3

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Sjourn View Post
    It's a binding advert, you can try CASE or legal way...
    hahhaha...
    oh well.
    i rather spend more time in my bath tub soaking.

    that's why i told my friend to just approach modelling agencies.
    though they demand higher rates, well, so be it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Punggol 21
    Posts
    967

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    U be the model loh..
    I lup SG, but SG don't love me...

  5. #5

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    "my rates are high aka you cant afford it...."


    dont you get it my dear?

  6. #6

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    I think we should have a sticky on Kiddie holiday seasons.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Beyond Space-Time Continuum
    Posts
    6,324

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    all you need a sch year calendar.

  8. #8

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunbucker View Post
    I think we should have a sticky on Kiddie holiday seasons.
    it's sad really.
    make a quick buck to fuel one's passion for branded goods?
    comon, i'm sure it's not to pay for their own fees right?
    doh...

  9. #9

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by TMC View Post
    all you need a sch year calendar.
    but if we were to avoid these 'flooding' seasons, wouldnt it spoil the market for REAL players?people are are genuinely providing their services?


    it's sad..boohoo hoo.

  10. #10

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    i really wonder...how high is high?

    500/ hour?
    1k/ hour?

    duh....

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    east
    Posts
    585

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Ya, next time the photog should post "Looking for lingerie model, my paying rates are good, BUT I only consider the model if she is able to pose/ creat those expressions i want/ blah blah blah... and oh, I must be comfortable with her..."

  12. #12

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by TMC View Post
    all you need a sch year calendar.
    now got to make sure got age as well, sekali underage and end up jail....
    Never forget rule 5
    My Flickr

  13. #13

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by kg_yew View Post
    Ya, next time the photog should post "Looking for lingerie model, my paying rates are good, BUT I only consider the model if she is able to pose/ creat those expressions i want/ blah blah blah... and oh, I must be comfortable with her..."
    good idea.

    but i think i should post
    "looking for lingerie models, i pay what i think you're worth.If you think no one can afford your rates, then dont f bother to f reply."

  14. #14

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by jeanie View Post
    i really wonder...how high is high?

    500/ hour?
    1k/ hour?

    duh....
    Jeanie, you should just message her and ask for her portfolio and modeling history, as you need to justify paying her. If she has none, just tell her she should be the one paying you, not you paying her. And if you do pay her, she gets none of the photos, all images are your property.
    Alpha

  15. #15

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Alpha

  16. #16

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    now got to make sure got age as well, sekali underage and end up jail....
    maybe CS should really put a cap on age of models.

    i hate to think these gals are exploiting you guys' cheehongness just to make a quick buck.

    it's really sad.

  17. #17

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by jeanie View Post
    maybe CS should really put a cap on age of models.

    i hate to think these gals are exploiting you guys' cheehongness just to make a quick buck.

    it's really sad.
    not only girls exploiting the guys here some workshop organiser as well
    Never forget rule 5
    My Flickr

  18. #18

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by Rashkae View Post
    Jeanie, you should just message her and ask for her portfolio and modeling history, as you need to justify paying her. If she has none, just tell her she should be the one paying you, not you paying her. And if you do pay her, she gets none of the photos, all images are your property.
    thanks for the advise.
    but other than dance shoots and 'normal' portraiture, i'm really NOT into shooting lingerie.

    i'm just helping a good friend doing some searching.

    it's my s... luck.1st model to email to, and this is the kind of s... reply i get.
    i told my friend about it..he laughed his head off.
    he kept asking me to ask exactly HOW HIGH her charges are...

    btw, is it true that if one pay for a model, he is not liable to give her (be it hard/soft copy) her pics?
    Last edited by jeanie; 5th March 2008 at 05:05 PM.

  19. #19

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    Quote Originally Posted by jeanie View Post
    maybe CS should really put a cap on age of models.

    i hate to think these gals are exploiting you guys' cheehongness just to make a quick buck.

    it's really sad.
    Have you seen the workshop thread? Threads like "4 girls for $4 an hour!!!" and "Sexy bikini!!" are everywhere.

    And 99% of them really can't make it, they're just willing to let their pictures be taken. And then they even get paid???
    Alpha

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    east
    Posts
    585

    Default Re: NO lingerie, lingerie upon 'consideration'?duh...

    "..but i think i should post
    "looking for lingerie models, i pay what i think you're worth.If you think no one can afford your rates, then dont f bother to f reply."..



    Haha, that's a good one...seems like the photog is always at the expense of the models, shouldn't it be a fair way of looking at things?

    And the best thing is always "I'm juz starting out...." If the photog says he/she's juz starting out on phototgraphy, do u think the models bother to reply?

    Juz my observation.

Page 1 of 8 1236 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •