![]() |
|
|||||||
| Video Cameras Using SD, thinking of HD? Find out about video cameras in here. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NW-Sg
Posts: 630
|
Anyone ever use a teleconverter for DVX102B? how was it? any light lost? how much and where to buy?
thx.. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Currently, Singapore but hope
Posts: 729
|
Hey Jensen,
Have tested all the teleconvertors, including Century Optics 1.6x. There's vignetting up to about 50% zoom for 1.6x to about 75% for 2.0x before vignet is gone. So unless you really need the distance, it's reaaly not worth the money. It really limits you zoom range and also doubles your aperture / iris. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NW-Sg
Posts: 630
|
hi tommon,
thx for the info.. i have been doing quite alot of live feed event. at times i could not position my cam front engh to capture a tighter shot with my pana 102 or sony z1.. due to space constraint.. tot a tele will bring me closer.. probably getting another cam w further zoom is a better option.. ![]() |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Currently, Singapore but hope
Posts: 729
|
Yep, those century optics are not cheap $1.8k at least.
Maybe try the JVC 111 or 110 with 17x zoom. Someone was trying to sell a NTSC ver Last edited by tommon; 17th March 2008 at 11:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NW-Sg
Posts: 630
|
![]() I have read some report on the tele converter from Century Optics on Pana DVX with no aperture lost.. i am not very convinced with the report as logically with another layer of glass added shd have cut some lights, and normaly need to compensate with 1 to 2 stop.. Last edited by sundazz; 19th March 2008 at 12:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Currently, Singapore but hope
Posts: 729
|
It says almost no noticable light lost, probably the CCD compensated slightly. Nothing like the real thing. Maybe invest in a crane instead. haha
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|