ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Equipment Discussions > Sony/Konica-Minolta

Sony/Konica-Minolta Dream. Create. Live


 
Thread Tools
Old 2nd March 2008   #1
Rashkae
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,302
Default Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Take a look at this:



and guess what? On the left is the nikon at f/5.3 and on the right is the Sony at f/8. Bokeh on the sony platform is king!
__________________
Alpha
Rashkae is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #2
eawtan
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tampines
Posts: 1,090
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by Rashkae View Post

and guess what? On the left is the nikon at f/5.3 and on the right is the Sony at f/8. Bokeh on the sony platform is king!
Could you show samples with the same aperture?
eawtan is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #3
TME
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Clementi
Posts: 6,188
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by eawtan View Post
Could you show samples with the same aperture?
Bro, having that kind of bokeh at f/8 is super impressive cos small apertures usually create highlights in the bokeh which is not good like the Nikon example... the large aperture pictures at f/3.5 would be pretty much the same as at f/8 I would expect...
TME is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 2nd March 2008   #4
grantyale
Member
 
grantyale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pioneer
Posts: 1,396
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Isn't the CZ twice as expensive?
grantyale is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #5
Rashkae
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,302
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by grantyale View Post
Isn't the CZ twice as expensive?
No. The 16-85 VR is about SGD 960, same as the CZ price outside SG.

http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showp...36&postcount=4
__________________
Alpha
Rashkae is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #6
Rashkae
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,302
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by eawtan View Post
Could you show samples with the same aperture?
Sure, many more examples from the site owner:

http://www.pbase.com/davidkilpatrick..._vr_vs_cz_1680
__________________
Alpha
Rashkae is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #7
boombox
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,136
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Interesting...

Many of his shots are not controlled enough for comparison purposes I notice.

Though I'd like to note that in the DRO/Active D lighting test, the A200 seemed warmer in colour tone and darker in the shadows.
__________________
www.chaoxangel.com

Last edited by boombox; 2nd March 2008 at 10:30 PM.
boombox is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #8
cam seach
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 171
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

There are difference bokeh but not better
cam seach is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #9
Gunjack
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Zimbabwe
Posts: 998
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

The CZ 16-80mm bokeh and pastel colours look very much like a lot of the olden european lens that are so nice for outdoor portraits! My first experience with that kind of look which is quite hard to explain is with the Zenit 55mm F2 m42 cheap Russian lens. I got to admit I find the bokeh from the Nikon 16-85mm VR in that sample unsightly, but a test at the same aperture would be better.
__________________
My Nikon Blog
My Sony Blog
Gunjack is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #10
Gunjack
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Zimbabwe
Posts: 998
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Actually looking carefully again at the above sample, are they shot exactly at the same focal length? It seems like the CZ 16-85mm was shot at a little more telephoto than the Nikon 16-85mm VR?
__________________
My Nikon Blog
My Sony Blog
Gunjack is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #11
Gunjack
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Zimbabwe
Posts: 998
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Opps.. on 2nd look, the smoother bokeh fooled me into thinking it was a shot at a more telephoto focal length. After looking carefully again, it looked quite similar focal length. Very impressive feature for outdoor portraits indeed!
__________________
My Nikon Blog
My Sony Blog
Gunjack is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #12
psychobiologist
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,267
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by Rashkae View Post
Take a look at this:



and guess what? On the left is the nikon at f/5.3 and on the right is the Sony at f/8. Bokeh on the sony platform is king!
right shot seems more telephoto than the left shot, given the angle of view of the background
__________________
chezburgr i can haz?
psychobiologist is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #13
hlw8888
Member
 
hlw8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somewhere in heartland
Posts: 629
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

abit OT.

the pics give me a chance to compare the colors and quality of the pics produced by 2 new entry-level cams. it seems to me that A200 produces pics that are more natural looking while D60 produces pics that are more vibrantly looking. am i right to say that?
__________________
FUJIFILM S5700 | NIKON D70
http://hlw8888.multiply.com/ | www.flickr.com/photos/26238059@N06/

Last edited by hlw8888; 2nd March 2008 at 11:42 PM.
hlw8888 is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #14
dr34mc4st3r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,843
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by hlw8888 View Post
abit OT.

the pics give me a chance to compare the colors and quality of the pics produced by 2 new entry-level cams. it seems to me that A200 produces pics that are more natural looking while D60 produces pics that are more vibrantly looking. am i right to say that?
usually DSLRs will product natural colours. how vibrant depends what you want . can be set.
__________________
sony a700 | km 5d | m d7 film
sig12-24/cz16-80/70-300g/sig400/lensbaby2.0
dr34mc4st3r is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #15
dr34mc4st3r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,843
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by Rashkae View Post
Take a look at this:



and guess what? On the left is the nikon at f/5.3 and on the right is the Sony at f/8. Bokeh on the sony platform is king!
for a moment i thought the left photo was taken with 500mm AF reflex....donut bokeh
__________________
sony a700 | km 5d | m d7 film
sig12-24/cz16-80/70-300g/sig400/lensbaby2.0
dr34mc4st3r is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #16
Rashkae
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,302
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by psychobiologist View Post
right shot seems more telephoto than the left shot, given the angle of view of the background
No, they're both at the same focal length. I think he set up 2 tripods next to each other.
__________________
Alpha
Rashkae is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #17
Rashkae
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,302
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by dr34mc4st3r View Post
for a moment i thought the left photo was taken with 500mm AF reflex....donut bokeh
Nope, but the 7-bladed Nikon aperture is pretty obvious.
__________________
Alpha
Rashkae is offline  
Old 2nd March 2008   #18
Rashkae
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,302
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by dr34mc4st3r View Post
usually DSLRs will product natural colours. how vibrant depends what you want . can be set.
Yes, but default color profile and the lens can make a difference here. CZ glass is known for sharpness and high contrast.
__________________
Alpha
Rashkae is offline  
Old 3rd March 2008   #19
zaren
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,709
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by Rashkae View Post
Take a look at this:



and guess what? On the left is the nikon at f/5.3 and on the right is the Sony at f/8. Bokeh on the sony platform is king!
the one on the right is at f/4.5 not f/8. bokeh would be expected to be better for larger aperture due to smaller depth of field.
zaren is offline  
Old 3rd March 2008   #20
eow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,498
Default Re: Nikon 16-85 VR versus CZ 16-80: bokeh!!

Originally Posted by zaren View Post
the one on the right is at f/4.5 not f/8. bokeh would be expected to be better for larger aperture due to smaller depth of field.
hmm probably true..
__________________
头可断,血可流,倩女不可不追求 carpe diem,when in doubt, hoot first,apologise later:p GALLERY
eow is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.12502 seconds with 7 queries