![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Singapore
Posts: 303
|
Looking for a cheap tripod.
Folded length must be less than 21 or 22 inch, must come with a head. Dun mind if it's 4 section. Any recommendations? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
|
What would the weight of your typical setup when mounted on the tripod? would be easier to recommend if you could also put that down, and the budget you are working with.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Singapore
Posts: 303
|
Weight... shouldn't be more than 1.5kg - I am using F70 and dun really use heavy lenses.
Budget.... around $100, maybe, if the tripod is really worth it dun mind paying more. But The folded length must be shorter then 21inch, so I presume I will be looking at a 4 section tripod. Any recommendations, thanks!!! |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: West
Posts: 249
|
Why not invest in a good tripod, esp if you are a serious photographer. A good tripod should last you a long time. Stability of the tripod makes sharp pictures. Good tripod reduces virbration from passing traffic (eg Shears Bridge) and from camera shutter.
![]() Recomemdation: Manfrotto 190B or 190ProB + 486RC2 Ballhead |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: toa payoh
Posts: 127
|
totally agree wif pepper...
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 13,397
|
perhaps a Slik Sprint Pro GM? It's slightly longer but fits the other requirements. Won't be very stable with big lenses though and you might want to get a better head.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 487
|
![]() I'm very very happy with the new combine weight ![]() Seriously, if you're a outdoor shooter, Don't buy equipments that are too heavy to carry around for ONE Whole day ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West
Posts: 698
|
BUT you are looking for a 4 section, I would not extend the Sprint Pro beyond 3 sections, as the last part is very wobbly when fully extend. So if you really need extra height, extend section 4 mid-way instead. You could get it new for about $80 at MS Color, a good buy. I did not buy a new head for this though, preferring to buy a UN Jumbo Quick Shoe instead. Works fine for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northern Singapore
Posts: 303
|
Thanks folk. Went to CP today and saw the Slik Sprint Pro too. Considering tt now.
What is a good head to go with it? Would appreciate if anyone could give me a rough indication of the prices ![]() Hee Thanks!! |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
A good, stable tripod cannot provide a stable platform for the camera if the place you put the tripod on is shaking or vibrating. Camera shutters do not shake the camera. It's the mirror slap in SLRs that cause the problem. Last edited by mervlam; 4th June 2003 at 07:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 441
|
I am going to hijack Freed's thread and see if I get answer for my question instead of starting another tripod thread
![]() I am currently using a Manfrotto 190CLB with 141RC head. What I need to know if this setup is O.K for a Nikon F100 and AF-S Nikkor 300/2.8 (some times with TC-14E II or TC-20E II) Or would the tripod be better with a ball head ? or a different tripod and head ? cheers and sorry Freed james m .... |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
i dont really know the answer but these are the guidelines i follow. 1) weight of load. don't overload your tripod or the tripod head. stay within the limits of the specifications. 2) i presume that you have a tripod collar for the 300mm? use that. 3) personally, i think a panhead will be more stable than a ballhead for heavier lenses. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|