![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 85
|
All the following calculated based on 4:3 aspect ratio using pyth's theorem
6.3 MP 1/1.6-inch diagonal ccd: Area = 0.166 sq in : Density = 38 MP per sq in 9 MP 1/1.7-inch diagonal ccd: Area = 0.1875 sq in : Density = 48 MP per sq in 11 MP 2/3-inch diagonal ccd: Area = 0.2133 sq in : Density = 52 MP per sq in 12 MP 22mmx15mm ccd on SLR: Area converted = 0.55 sq in : Density = 22 MP per sq in If you count it as 6MP (which it really is)... Density = 11 MP per sq in !!! Goes to show that other than the SLR ccds, the older 6.3 MP ccds would still be better choice than the newer 9MP and 11MP consumer/prosumer camera ccds... Digress using Sony's 35mm full frame 24MP ccd Area after conversion = 1.3 sq in : Density = 18 MP per sq in... Interesting! |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 161
|
I predict the Megapixel war will only end when it reach 40 MegaPixel when either no more improvement in optical performance or the diffraction effect start to negate any further improvement in detail.
__________________
Nikon D200, 17-55, 24-85, 18-200VR, 80-200 f2.8D, 50 f1.8D, Sigma 10-20, SB800 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|