Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Is Photography Dead?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York*New Jersey*Boston
    Posts
    1,072

    Default Is Photography Dead?

    Regards, Mark Pang
    www.markpangphotography.com

  2. #2

    Default Re: Is Photography Dead?

    Quote Originally Posted by haagen_dazs View Post
    Nice article. It's a good read. Thanks for the link.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Where the wind blows...
    Posts
    4,528

    Default Re: Is Photography Dead?

    Thanks for the link....its a soul searching article, literally.

  4. #4

    Thumbs up Re: Is Photography Dead?

    Thanks for the article!
    Black Rabbit Photography
    DeviantArt | Multiply | Flickr

  5. #5
    Member/Tangshooter Redsun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    7,932

    Default Re: Is Photography Dead?

    good read!
    thanks for sharing!

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Hillview
    Posts
    67

    Default Re: Is Photography Dead?

    interesting opionated article. thanks for sharing the link.
    I am not an artisitc person, so can understand only maybe 20~30% of the article. Still, I think there is always skepticalism to alternate form of artistic presentation, especailly when it is 'new' and when it deviates from tradition.
    Reminds me of the time when CD was launched, quite a lot of people said the sound is too 'clear; and they think turntable was still better; likewsie in photographic margarines, every now and then, i come across comments about film is better and Digital photography is better?
    anyway, I admire good photography, be it 'real' photo or heavily 'ps'-ed, film or digital, darkroom or ps.

  7. #7
    Senior Member zac08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East
    Posts
    11,755

    Default Re: Is Photography Dead?

    Quote Originally Posted by sampan View Post
    interesting opionated article. thanks for sharing the link.
    I am not an artisitc person, so can understand only maybe 20~30% of the article. Still, I think there is always skepticalism to alternate form of artistic presentation, especailly when it is 'new' and when it deviates from tradition.
    Reminds me of the time when CD was launched, quite a lot of people said the sound is too 'clear; and they think turntable was still better; likewsie in photographic margarines, every now and then, i come across comments about film is better and Digital photography is better?
    anyway, I admire good photography, be it 'real' photo or heavily 'ps'-ed, film or digital, darkroom or ps.
    Actually I can feel with the piece of article...

    PS should be used to clean up certain issues with lighting or contrast issues and not to make it into a fairy tale picture with multiple elements from various pics...
    Michael Lim
    My Flickr Site

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •