ClubSNAP Photography Forums

Go Back   ClubSNAP Photography Forums > Photo Galleries > Critique Corner

Notices

Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting.


 
Thread Tools
Old 29th November 2007   #1
funniecrys
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hougang
Posts: 31
Question Dilapidated.

Hi all,

I'm a newbie dabbling into photography. I'm planning to purchase my DSLR, but in the meantime, thought i'll try to work on composition first with my P&S. (To sum up, it's probably my virgin attempt at 'proper' photography, & photoshop! )



This was a 3 megapixel picture taken with my Sony cam. I did try to adjust using exposure & stuff using the P-mode, but lost all details when I removed the pictures from my cam.

I thought it depicted the mood of being dilapidated coz of the wild grass growing by the sides & moss on the steps. Wonder if it's too boring a picture? Any good tips to take note of when composing pictures? C&C please.


cheers.
funniecrys is offline  
Old 29th November 2007   #2
waileong
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,597
Default Re: Dilapidated.

Overgrown might be a better title. Dilapidated typically refers to houses, buildings, etc..
waileong is offline  
Old 29th November 2007   #3
Del_CtrlnoAlt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
Default Re: Dilapidated.

need to work on your hyperfocal... your focus is front, rear is blur.
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me.
Del_CtrlnoAlt is offline  
Sponsored Link
Old 29th November 2007   #4
attap seed
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 541
Default Re: Dilapidated.

to me, the light is a little flat.

i like side light, which emphasises texture, shape and gives depth to an image.
attap seed is offline  
Old 29th November 2007   #5
funniecrys
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hougang
Posts: 31
Default Re: Dilapidated.

Originally Posted by waileong View Post
Overgrown might be a better title. Dilapidated typically refers to houses, buildings, etc..
Noted. Will try to increase relevancy to picture. Thanks.
funniecrys is offline  
Old 29th November 2007   #6
m3lv1nh0
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Serangoon North
Posts: 2,050
Default Re: Dilapidated.

Originally Posted by Del_CtrlnoAlt View Post
need to work on your hyperfocal... your focus is front, rear is blur.
Mate, can explain what is hyperfocal? I would like ot learn too. Thanks.
__________________
Weddings . Blog . Facebook
m3lv1nh0 is offline  
Old 29th November 2007   #7
waileong
Deregistered
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,597
Default Re: Dilapidated.

Originally Posted by m3lv1nh0 View Post
Mate, can explain what is hyperfocal? I would like ot learn too. Thanks.
Google to learn.
waileong is offline  
Old 29th November 2007   #8
m3lv1nh0
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Serangoon North
Posts: 2,050
Default Re: Dilapidated.

Originally Posted by waileong View Post
Google to learn.
The best advice I have heard in awhile. Thanks.
__________________
Weddings . Blog . Facebook
m3lv1nh0 is offline  
Old 29th November 2007   #9
Del_CtrlnoAlt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Outside the Dry Box.
Posts: 16,342
Default Re: Dilapidated.

Originally Posted by m3lv1nh0 View Post
Mate, can explain what is hyperfocal? I would like ot learn too. Thanks.
hyperfocal in layman is about making an entire picture from the point nearest to you til the infinity focal point all sharp.

something like tis...







as opposed to something like...




where by you have front focus and the rear is blur. or the common mistake, infinity sharp, front blur when taking landscape shots.

in hyperfocal we set the aperture to give a certain DOF, and we don't focus on infinity instead, we focus on nearer subjects.

for eg,

a wide angle lens with a infinity from 10m and above. minimum focusing distance is 2m

if wide open a lens is only so shallow (f2.8), if will for eg, make 1m distance sharp.
so if u focus any point from 2m to 10m, u got a space of 2m sharp...

if we close it down to f5.6 for eg, it will be 2m sharp rear to front when u focus at a certain point.

so on and so forth.

so if we know for eg f16 will give 10m sharp, we focus on like tis...

*infinity*
-5m-
focal point (set to 5m)
-5m-

then everything in that region will be sharp... but normally not so accurate, so we will buffer extra for infinity to make sure its covered... like set to 6m instead. then you have 1m before you thats blur.

thats the rough idea. you have to experiment...

some old lenses come with a DOF scale which makes it easier to understand. newer lenses does not have this nowadays.
__________________
Logging Off Permanently. Those who need to contact me will know where to contact me.
Del_CtrlnoAlt is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2009 ClubSNAP.com
Page generated in 0.07713 seconds with 7 queries