![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32
|
Hi there,
I am an amateur photography who owns a D70s. Can anyone advice what is the best lens for wildlife photography. The camera shop says Nikon 70 - 300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED-1F AF-S VR Zoom Nikkor Telephoto lens. Appreciate your advice. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,167
|
Best? 500f4 / 600f4 / 300f2.8
But heck, not affordable @ all.... Indeed the 70-300f4.5-5.6 vr would be a gd starting point. Also do consider the Nikon AFS 300f4 and a teleconverter (1.4x / 1.7x) or the Nikon 80-400VR
__________________
http://zyy.smugmug.com |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32
|
thanks for your tips !!! appreciate that.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#5 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32
|
what about either one of the following?
1) AF-S DX VR Zoom - Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED 2) AF-S DX Zoom 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,167
|
Not to mention your subjs are likely to be under heavy foilage, cutting light levels dramatically. F5.6 is not likely to give u enough shutter speed, esp when handholding n bobbing on a boat. Shooting a VR lens from a tripod on the boat would help. Wait for the pros to chime in with their suggestions. I would say if budget n space is at a premium, consider either the 80-400f4.5-5.6 VR / 70-200f2.8 VR (with teleconverters) Of course ideally u shoot from @ least a 300f2.8VR on a tripod fr the boat. U are likely to be disappointed using a 55-200 or 18-200 zoom.
__________________
http://zyy.smugmug.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NorthEast
Posts: 16,504
|
3-5 feet is very near, how big are the subjects?
without knowing the size of the subjects i would say a 70-200VR would be enough, but you got to watch for the minimal focusing distance
__________________
The Law |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 170
|
80-400VR is pretty good, nice contrast etc. Just that it is a bit slow in the focusing. Never really liked my 18-200 performance for long distance subjects.... a bit soft...
__________________
Nikon D80,D300,D700.Tokina 12-24,Tamron 90,Nikon 18-200, 70-200, 80-400, 50, 85, 17-55, 24-70 & no $ |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The East Sider Mountain Biker
Posts: 915
|
The len is not an AFS lens but earlier AF model so it means it will need the gearing mechnism on the DSLR body to twist the AF device on the lens meaning...if you are using anything that is not a Pro DSLR body, it will be even slower to perform AF as the gearing device on a D70 or D70s is not as powerful. A tendency to track alot so for a lens use to go on safari this might be the least choicest lens to get. Not much of a apeture option but as a glass piece..the lens is tack sharp. Last edited by sammy888; 19th November 2007 at 06:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,267
|
sigma 100-300 F/4, possibly a teleconverter for further reach if needed.
then again wanting close up at 3-5 feet? isnt that a bit near?
__________________
chezburgr i can haz? |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|