![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Yishun
Posts: 2,563
|
Interested in that lens... seeking advice and feedback if you have used it before... thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: CCK
Posts: 1,356
|
here's one of the reviews from www.photographyreview.com Summary: Great lens, just as sharp as my old 28-70(which was great)& weather sealed to boot. Strengths: sharpness & super fast AF Weaknesses: weight i believe the presence of UD element in 24-70L is probably to overcome the barrel distortion which is commonly seen in 24mm zoom well the price u going to pay is well justified for the UD glass and water and dust resistance built for a tighter bubget, i believe the 28-70L will serve u well too in term of sharpness just my 2cts quote ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central West
Posts: 605
|
The 24 range makes it even a greater lens. Your only regret will probably be the weight.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 63
|
Its a very good and sharp lens however someone mentioned its weight and he's right it is heavy and pretty long too.Weight combined with a body is about 2+ kg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: cck, Singapore
Posts: 309
|
after lots of test and comparision, i feel and have to agree that the pics taken using my 85/f.18 is more fresh, pleasant, 3D and sharp than taken using my 28-70L.
i even tried blind mixing one 85 f/1.8 pic file into 50 28-70L pics files without seeing the pics. then picked up the most pleasant one. damn...it's the 85 f/1.8 one. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|