Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

  1. #1

    Default What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    As above, in a way that some of their bodies have solid functions and not so good casings

    Eg :
    Nikon D40x, good CCD but lousy casing
    Nikon D80, good functions [comparable to D200] but not so nice casing

    Views? And any more examples?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Northern Singapore
    Posts
    445

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Quote Originally Posted by CYNx3 View Post
    As above, in a way that some of their bodies have solid functions and not so good casings

    Eg :
    Nikon D40x, good CCD but lousy casing
    Nikon D80, good functions [comparable to D200] but not so nice casing

    Views? And any more examples?
    All cameras are built to a price point, in order to be competitive. I have used most of the Nikon bodies since the F3 and I can say that basically you get what you pay for. I have used the D40 (a friend's) and for the price, you can't really complain. If you wanted something really rugged, then you'd have to shell out a lot more money. The question is, do you really need it?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    東京 Tokyo
    Posts
    10,193

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    don't really get what you mean by lousy casing/not so nice casing. in terms of casing, the grip is probably all i care about, and i like Nikon's sensitive design for the grip. i used to use a D70s and got a D80 this year, the latter is smaller than D70s. D70s' grip was ok, i thought D80's grip was going to be difficult, but after using it i like how it still balance well despite the smallness, and the light weight allows me to bring it to places without having the feeling that i'm taking too many things with me. maybe my palm isn't that big, but it works well for me.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    2,256

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    er. no diff in ergonomics for me, grip feels the same on all nikon dslrs, firm and good. its only the weight that varies
    chezburgr i can haz?

  5. #5

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    nikon cameras have pretty good build compared to the other marques. d40 is entry level so of course build may lose out to higher models. d200 .... yummy ...

  6. #6

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    compare to the F5, i think most of the dslrs are not built as chunky. but with the chunkiness comes the weight.

  7. #7
    Senior Member zac08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East
    Posts
    11,755

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Feel is definitely better as you go up the range. But do you feel it worth it or not, it's up to you.

    I just realisedr recently that the D80 is hard plastic grip as opposed to the softer rubber grip of the D200. So it's a matter of choice and budget...
    Michael Lim
    My Flickr Site

  8. #8
    Senior Member sammy888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapor
    Posts
    1,568

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Quote Originally Posted by hacknet View Post
    compare to the F5, i think most of the dslrs are not built as chunky. but with the chunkiness comes the weight.
    For me chunky was my F5 but the one that took the prize is the olderr F4s. That was built like a tank. Dropped it more then a few times and it keeps on working but then again I have dropped or bumped hard all my camera bodies all these years and I never had a single problem where it failed. But then again you have to pay the price for it. You get just as good a camera from any top brands these day for the money you pay for. The Pro bodies goes alot further as they are made to have not just the best functions or features but it's built to last a long time and to take more abusive then the regular sunday Joe is able to. That kind of combination thus requires more sophisticated assembly, exotic materials as casings and internal structuring to protect the mechanical and delicate electronic components that's inside each Pro-bodies.

    But that is not to say the lower end ones are that "bad" that you should feel somewhat short-changed or insulted that they give you these choices. Take my D70 for example, for its price, it is well made. For those who feel bodies in these price ranges are bad, this plastic they use is the same used in Stealth Planes..they are typically your higher end plastic that offer a good weight vs toughness combo for the sunday shooter or even semi-pro shooter to use on a daily basis. Yes in the early days, mechanical cameras or even electronic one like F90 or my old FG have metal bodies. But these days, tough plastic and moulding technology was still in it's infancy. Times have changes and there are plastic that is alot stronger and more resistance to vibration then metal. Of course even that, that is up to a point before you have to go back to some thing metail but even that is some exotic amalgamented material. Translation? Not cheap material.

    In my youngers days ya..great fun carry a bag full of lens and 2 bodies and a big tripod around but now decision to cut down to just a few lens and one body and a tripod suits me just fine. I wish the body was heavier as it promote a more stable weight for me to shoot at slower speed without a tripod but well..it's a trade off. I like to carry a lighter bag around town! heheheh

    I banged my D70 too and most of the time don't even put it in a proper camera bag all these years and it is still ticking along fine. There really is no reason to nitpick. You can wait 10 yrs but there will always be things found on Pro-Bodies that will NEVER come down to be adapted on lower end cameras. Some do but never everything.The simple truth is..you GET what you PAY for.
    Last edited by sammy888; 11th November 2007 at 01:24 AM. Reason: typo

  9. #9

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Quote Originally Posted by CYNx3 View Post
    As above, in a way that some of their bodies have solid functions and not so good casings

    Eg :
    Nikon D40x, good CCD but lousy casing
    Nikon D80, good functions [comparable to D200] but not so nice casing

    Views? And any more examples?
    i don't get what you're trying to say.

    Nikon has one of the best ergonomically designed bodies you can find in the market, throughout it's range. and what is a casing??
    photographs
    Nikon D200 | Konica Hexar RF

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bukit Timah
    Posts
    145

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    I felt not much difference from my D80 to a borrowed D200. Just difference in the weight. Grip is good for my hands. Image quality roughly the same, the D200 just a bit more rugged than the D80. The feel of handling a D200 is shiok, better than a D80 of course. You really pay for what you get. Don't expect too many good things with a D40x.
    Nikon D80|Nikon 18-135 AF-S DX|Nikon 70-300 AF|Nikon 50 f/1.4 AFD|Nikon SB-800|Canon IXUS 70

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Clementi
    Posts
    458

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    tried a D80 and D40, D40 is lighter, smaller, the grip also quite small for me

    own a D80 the grip is ok but with added battery grip, the grip is wonderful

    just my 2 cents
    http://www.dreamstime.com/Ionsoon_info
    So much Creativity So much Technology

  12. #12
    Senior Member Kit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Upper Bukit Timah
    Posts
    11,650

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Quote Originally Posted by CYNx3 View Post
    As above, in a way that some of their bodies have solid functions and not so good casings

    Eg :
    Nikon D40x, good CCD but lousy casing
    Nikon D80, good functions [comparable to D200] but not so nice casing

    Views? And any more examples?
    Define "lousy". They crack up at the sight of sunlight?? So how many casings have you went through?

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Balestier
    Posts
    98

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    If you noticed, Nikon's built quality has ALWAYS surpassed that of Canon's. Just look at its 30D - so plasticky, but of course, they have improved with their latest launches.

    My 20 eyars with Nikon was 'coz its built quality and weather sealed. Of course, it would be HEAVY, and if u walk 16 hours a day lugging your equipment, then u will know what I mean.

    Each brand has it's strong points and for low light, it is Canon, sports, also Canon. But with the latest offerings from both camps, u would see that the line dividing these are blurring... some sports shooters are shifting camps liaw.... with the new CMOS from Nikon, would the low-light issue be solved/bettered? Let's just see.

    It is at times irritating when one goes into the "is Nikon better or Canon better" discussion, just like sports fanatic's "MU vs Arsenal". Just shoot with what you have... For myself, I never liked to discuss my pix and/or other ppl's pix as photography is SO INDIVIDUALISTIC. If YOU feel YOUR pix is nice, then it is nice... period!

    IF you ask for C&C (hope everyone know what C&C means), then be ready to accept POSITIVE and NEGATIVE critiques and/or comments. I have seen some only able to take POSITIVE ones, then those fellas should note "only POSITIVE C&C welcomed". If you don't like C&C at all, then please don't end your pix or note with C&C. For others, if you don't see C&C asked, then zip up.

    When I get the chance to meet you guys, I can share with you the 'differences' between SG and MY photo forums. Sorry, a little OT the last few para
    Who Dares Wins!

  14. #14
    Senior Member giantcanopy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    SG
    Posts
    6,232

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Quote Originally Posted by CYNx3 View Post
    As above, in a way that some of their bodies have solid functions and not so good casings
    Eg :
    Nikon D40x, good CCD but lousy casing
    Nikon D80, good functions [comparable to D200] but not so nice casing
    Not so good casings ? I do not think so
    Not so nice casings ? subjective

    I think you are referring to the build ? It was the feel of the D80 that made me decide to buy it over the Canon 400D some time back.

    I would think Nikon is constantly striving to design their bodies to provide the best shooting experience for their photographers.

    Peace
    Ryan

  15. #15
    Senior Member knpan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    3,651

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Quote Originally Posted by CYNx3 View Post
    As above, in a way that some of their bodies have solid functions and not so good casings

    Eg :
    Nikon D40x, good CCD but lousy casing
    Nikon D80, good functions [comparable to D200] but not so nice casing

    Views? And any more examples?
    you should elaborate more

  16. #16

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    I don't know how to elaborate. I think you should know how to elaborate.

  17. #17

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Quote Originally Posted by CYNx3 View Post
    I don't know how to elaborate. I think you should know how to elaborate.
    btw wat model r u currently using now? lol

  18. #18

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    D70s and some others which I don't want to disclose.

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Balestier
    Posts
    98

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    Quote Originally Posted by CYNx3 View Post
    D70s and some others which I don't want to disclose.
    Wah... so many cams until cannot disclose
    Whatever it is, one needs to hold the cam in his/her hand to feel if it is right for them... like for myself... I just cannot hold the Canon 350D, how good they say it was when it was launched those days... cannot means cannot, I dont care what ppl say... D200 fells like home.. as I have slightly bigger hands...
    Built? Ppl want this want that in their cam, weather seal, whatever seal, ... but have you seen photogs run like hell to keep their 'precious' when only a few rain drops fall!! Seal my foot lah!
    Get whatever model you think it built like a tank and stick with it, if not, we will label you hypocrite!
    Who Dares Wins!

  20. #20
    Senior Member Cheesecake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    I live in a haunted house!!!!!
    Posts
    16,385

    Default Re: What do you think of how Nikon build their camera bodies?

    need to keep the cost down and some parts gotta compromise. not only NIKON but Canon, Pentax, Sony and ALL DSLRs makers.

    where got build like a tank and affordable?

    last i know, D1 series very affordable now and yes, built like tanks.



    u can consider those.
    You'll Never Walk Alone! - i have the best job in the world!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •