![]() |
|
|||||||
| Newbies Corner The best place for those new to photography and ClubSNAP. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 437
|
i wanna get a 46mm CPL for my FZ18 but got the following queries:
1) which brand is better to get? and it's rough price. i dun wanna chop like carrot head. 2) will it be okie if i stack the CPL on top of a B+W UV filter? TIA |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
|
2. you can, but recommended to use 1 piece of filter to minimise/avoid vignette and loss of image quality |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 437
|
if i use two lenses, confirm will cause loss of IQ? wat if i use better lens? regarding vignette, if i use the DMW-LA3 (pic below) and fix a 55.8mm CPL, do you think it'll still happen? DMW-LA3 pict: http://www.ivanwong.com/ebay/Panasonic/DMW-LA3.jpg |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
|
as for using 55mm adapt, its too early to tell, doubt anyone here have handed both fz18 and the adapt. but most probably vignette will be there if you stack |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North
Posts: 2,596
|
If you are a B+W die hard fan then get their MRC CPL also! Don't stack filters. At the end of the day, you will just ask yourself i could have had a better quality picture if i hadn't stacked the filters
![]()
__________________
Canon 5D mkII|24-105mm F4 IS L|70-200mm F4 IS L|580EX|and more coming! :P |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 718
|
for the filter, ive been using hoya's cpl (77mm) on my 12-24; works out well, except significant vignetting at the 12mm end i suppose it would be worse if u stacked the filters, if u have that intention, get a thinner polariser, std 1s have 2 pieces of glass cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ClubSNAP community
Posts: 2,783
|
Unless you need to deal with reflecting surfaces, a CPL is practically a useless piece of glass. ND is more useful.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 437
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 111
|
Am I right to say that ND is used for the flollowing condition:
I take a landscape pic and the result is that my sky is overexposed while my foreground is underexposed or vice versa. I use a ND to correct these exposures due to mixed lighting. On the other hand, a CPL is used to saturate the colors and cut off reflections. It is not possible to solve the mixed lighting as describled above. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tampines, Singapore
Posts: 3,635
|
http://www.hoyafilter.com/products/hoya/oef-08.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North
Posts: 2,596
|
__________________
Canon 5D mkII|24-105mm F4 IS L|70-200mm F4 IS L|580EX|and more coming! :P |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|