Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Microdrive vs CF: Batt Life

  1. #1

    Question Microdrive vs CF: Batt Life

    Is using microdrive on the camera more battery exshausting compare to a CF card of the same size?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Microdrive vs CF: Batt Life

    Originally posted by Swakoo
    Is using microdrive on the camera more battery exshausting compare to a CF card of the same size?
    I got both microdrive and cf card. The microdrive work for 6 months and died but the first Cf card i bought is 3 years ago and is still functioning well.

    battery comsumption is not a issued.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Re: Microdrive vs CF: Batt Life

    Originally posted by Tan SK
    I got both microdrive and cf card. The microdrive work for 6 months and died but the first Cf card i bought is 3 years ago and is still functioning well.

    battery comsumption is not a issued.

    ooooh.. sad... sorry to hear that

    hmm hpoe my keep going..
    1year old liao

  4. #4
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    ClubSNAP community
    Posts
    2,775

    Default

    Only experienced it once before and that was almost 2 yrs ago. My then 340Mb MD flatted my batts after 3+ hours while my 128Mb CF lasted 5+. But they were used on 2 separate albeit consecutive days. T'was a Coolpix950 back then, in Hong Kong.

    Read somewhere that MD does affect batt but have to go find the article...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •