Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Big aperture do we really need them?

  1. #1
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    CCK-Yew Tee
    Posts
    1,693

    Default Big aperture do we really need them?

    Do we really need them when doing indoor shoot with Flash... Anyone??

  2. #2
    Moderator catchlights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Punggol, Singapore
    Posts
    21,902

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    why not? the advantages about using big aperture lens...

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
    in general, the sweet spot of a lens in two stops down, so the sweet spot of the a f2.8 lenses is at f5.6, and a f4.5 lenses is about f8.

    beside, most f2.8 lenses are sharp enough when shooting wide open, but the most important things is the f2.8 lenses have better contrast and color reproduction compare to those f4.5 lenses.

    another benefit of using a f2.8 lenses is you have a brighter view in your viewfinder.
    taken from Re: what is the use of the 17- 70mm range large aperture f2.8 since most are used for
    Shoot to Live, Live to Shoot
    www.benjaminloo.com | iStock portfolio

  3. #3
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    CCK-Yew Tee
    Posts
    1,693

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Quote Originally Posted by catchlights View Post
    why not? the advantages about using big aperture lens...



    taken from Re: what is the use of the 17- 70mm range large aperture f2.8 since most are used for
    I mean do 1 really have to spend so much to get a F2.8 where f3.5 can do the job... Tat wher money are concern... Because usually doing In doorshoot ! aperture will be ard F5-6 dont usually shoot with wide open... Isit?

  4. #4
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    CCK-Yew Tee
    Posts
    1,693

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Quote Originally Posted by excelglsi View Post
    I mean do 1 really have to spend so much to get a F2.8 where f3.5 can do the job... Tat wher money are concern... Because usually doing In doorshoot ! aperture will be ard F5-6 dont usually shoot with wide open... Isit?
    Thanks for the refer... seem the thread.. All question answer... thanks

  5. #5

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    No, it's entirely your choice.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    well, imo, indoor lighting can become very challenging unless you get yourself a strobe with softbox as a min. the money you save on the glass will be spent on the strobe, infact, i think a lot of the time, the glass might not seem to cost so much especially if you are comparing it against good lighting equip. the other thing would be that flash lighting is actually pretty tricky, its much much easier to get a 'nice' shot with the avaliable light.

    if the arguement is over f3.5 and f2.8, my adivce to you would be to get yourself some primes, and since you are indoors, theres a higher chance you can control the environment so, pick one tele and one wide and it might save you a whole lot of money compared to shooting with f2.8 zooms.

  7. #7
    Deregistered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    CCK-Yew Tee
    Posts
    1,693

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Quote Originally Posted by hacknet View Post
    well, imo, indoor lighting can become very challenging unless you get yourself a strobe with softbox as a min. the money you save on the glass will be spent on the strobe, infact, i think a lot of the time, the glass might not seem to cost so much especially if you are comparing it against good lighting equip. the other thing would be that flash lighting is actually pretty tricky, its much much easier to get a 'nice' shot with the avaliable light.

    if the arguement is over f3.5 and f2.8, my adivce to you would be to get yourself some primes, and since you are indoors, theres a higher chance you can control the environment so, pick one tele and one wide and it might save you a whole lot of money compared to shooting with f2.8 zooms.
    THanks.. How wide? Thanks again....

  8. #8

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    f stop is up to you...you decide what u want...

  9. #9

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    i shoot quite a bit of film so 28mm works for me, if you're shooting digital on a cropped sensor, see if you can fish out a manual 18 or 19mm. these are much cheaper than the auto focus variety. and at 18mm manual focusing is so simple, and its also where autofocus sensors have the most trouble..

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North
    Posts
    2,703

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Usually I do not use wide aperture when using flash. Do we REALLY need them? Not really but good to have IMO
    Canon 5D mkII|24-105 F4 IS L|70-200 F4 IS L|135 F2 L|580EX|

  11. #11

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    in restrained situations, fast lenses are indispensable.

    as for the TS actual question (shooting indoor with flash): i don't think it's really necessary.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    261

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Wide apertures are indispensable for achieving shallow depth of field, and I find myself shooting at apertures wider than f/2.8 very often just to blend background and make the subject to pop-up.

    Neither flash, nor high ISO, nor IS alone can give you narrow depth of field.

    Regarding the so called "sweet spot" which is two stops down. Well, that is probably true for consumer zooms many of which achieve their best performance at f/8 or f/11. That doesn’t mean the same rule applies to L zooms. For instance the 70-200 f/2.8 lenses are notorious for producing excellent results even wide open, and their sweet spot starts all the way from f/2.8.
    Last edited by Hitz; 20th September 2007 at 10:00 AM.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Wide apertures are indispensable for achieving shallow depth of field, and I find myself shooting at apertures wider than f/2.8 very often just to blend the background and make the subject to pop-up.

    Neither flash, nor high ISO, nor IS can give you narrow depth of field.
    you can also achieve shallow DOF with smaller apertures if you use a long focal length / subject too far from background .

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Under the Son
    Posts
    2,685

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Quote Originally Posted by excelglsi View Post
    Do we really need them when doing indoor shoot with Flash... Anyone??
    YES!..

  15. #15

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    With bigger apperture, you can allow more ambient light to balance with the flash exposure. I love to shoot with large aperture even with flash on.

    BC

  16. #16

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Quote Originally Posted by excelglsi View Post
    Do we really need them when doing indoor shoot with Flash... Anyone??
    If not, I would be contented shooting PnS.

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    261

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    Quote Originally Posted by jpgutierrez18 View Post
    you can also achieve shallow DOF with smaller apertures if you use a long focal length / subject too far from background .
    True. But firstly, doesn't that alter perspective as well? Narrow perspective might or might not be what you want, depending on what you are trying to shoot. Secondly, there might be not enough space behind to step back in order to fill the frame. And lastly, long lenses that can deliver good image quality don't come at cheap price (think about L telephoto primes).

  18. #18

    Default Re: Big aperture do we really need them?

    But firstly, doesn't that alter perspective as well? Narrow perspective might or might not be what you want, depending on what you are trying to shoot.
    i guess this one's another topic

    Secondly, there might be not enough space behind to step back in order to fill the frame
    yup that's why i stated in restrained conditions .

    And lastly, long lenses that can deliver good image quality don't come at cheap price (think about L telephoto primes).
    i think the cheap 70-300 ones can give acceptable quality already in this regard.

    anyway, the point is there are options but some things are to be compromised in any way: quality, shooting distance, lens speed, weight, price, etc.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •