Aniway, I'm confused with the last para as quoted.... if woman is primary caretakers, maintainence and assets should be weighted in their favor. So what happens when man is the caretaker, making similar (if not more) economic sacrifices. Can man even claim maintenance and more assets? Noting the below quotes:Originally Posted by Lam-Teo
Originally Posted by Lam-TeoAlso, how come the charter have no provision for exploiting or abuse of it, examples as quoted in the same article.Originally Posted by Lam-Teo
Originally Posted by Asia Times
'Lam-Teo' must be a 'independent' married woman. rare for such nick to appear in CS. Lam-Teo or Teo Lam? i am confused.