![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| Critique Corner Post your image in here to get serious and honest feedback from fellow photographers. Please read FAQ before posting. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: West
Posts: 1,376
|
Hi! This was taken in Sentosa last weekend.
I would like to seek your comments on the following composition (too messy?) lighting (too bright?) exposure (too much?) colour processing (from Raw to Tiff to JPEG is it too warm?) Your 1st impression (is it colourful?) Here is the EXIF information Camera: Olympus E-300 Shutter: 1/60 sec Aperature: f/11.0 ExposureProgram: 4 ISO: 200 MeteringMode: 5 Focal Length: 200.0 mm ExposureMode: 1 with tripod Thank you very much for your comments. Cheers, Last edited by hhho; 2nd September 2007 at 09:14 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,690
|
Adding on to what nightmare already mentioned - I think if this was taken at f3.5 at ISO 100 (that should give you a shutter of 1/300 or so), it will make a better image - given the same exact composition.
__________________
www.facebook.com/darrengyh |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: West
Posts: 1,376
|
Thank you for your comments.
As I've titled it as "Butterfly & flowers", I wanted to capture both objests of flowers and butterfly (in focus) f3.5 & ISO100 will definetely out the only question is whether these two (flowers & butterfly) can put together and give a nice combination for viewers. Bear in mind that it is an outdoor shot and not pre-arranged. How often you can find these (butterfly & ginger flower?) together? Cheers, |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,690
|
At the same time, the subjects in question are really on a shallow plane, so you didn't need to sacrifice ISO.
__________________
www.facebook.com/darrengyh |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: West
Posts: 1,376
|
and I would not stop down to f3.5 as I wanted these flowers and butterfly all in focus. Thank drakon09 for your advice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,252
|
i think you should not have put this in the critique corner
because critique is not what you are seeking simple as that, thanks for wasting my time, and drakon's deleting all the previous posts |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Where the wind blows...
Posts: 4,415
|
Yah, I think you don't really need f11 for this shot to have DOF to cover both the butt and the flower leh....may be you can try to calculate you DOF requirement on some DOF calculator easily available online.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North
Posts: 2,596
|
composition is too messy for my liking. Decide either to get the butterfly or the flower to be in focus...
__________________
Canon 5D mkII|24-105mm F4 IS L|70-200mm F4 IS L|580EX|and more coming! :P |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|