![]() |
|
|||||||
| Four Thirds Standard (4/3 and m43) Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds Discussions |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 714
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
looks good, seems like panny has raised the bar for live view AF...but only with compatible lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,240
|
Wow.. looks good.. can really see that Panny really put in lots of effort to try to capture the DSLR market share. not bad not bad.. i believe the 'feel' is very close to FZ50 which i really miss it. The handling & operation of FZ50 is much better than some of the DSLR. tilting LCD is a killer.. Got Face detection some more.. interesting interesting... Hmm... heart itchy itchy le.. ha ha...
![]() Let's hope they will produce more lens with more reasonable price.. Lens is very important neh... ha ha.. Click here to see more ![]() Last edited by DaXiong; 31st August 2007 at 12:55 AM. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,024
|
E-3 style screen!! Live View!! Macro shooters rejoice!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 714
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,929
|
.... crazy right? The contrast AF looks good but ONLY with those 2 lens???? common.... it should support all 4/3 lens and like that I will dump my e330 for it in a heartbeat, provided they have cheap body only option.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
let's hope there will be a firmware update for all ZD 4/3 lenses to be compatible with the L10 LV contrast AF system...
looks like it will be a sub $2k camera with kit lens... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,690
|
Probably firmware-crippled.
__________________
www.facebook.com/darrengyh |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: No dust, no auto focus area
Posts: 807
|
It seems odd that the improved AF system is restricted to a couple of lenses since they have so few available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 246
|
Wanted to pick up an E330 to complement my E-1, but now got one more choice to make. Hiaz....
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 714
|
Another reason, of course, would be the incorporation of Mega OIS ...... which also makes the Leica lenses MEGA BIG compare to the ZD ......
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 714
|
The features set in the DMC L10 looks great, full time LV AF, swivel LCD, Leica lens .... but ...personally, just my own personal opinion .... buying a camera with the same name as microwaves, cookers, torchlights ...... maybe Panasonic should consider another name for their higher end photographic products .......
![]() I mean, this is one Panny I really wouldn't mind owning ....... still .... I'll prob stick with Olympus and maybe keep some Leica lens when I start hitting the jackpot .... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
but Panasonic being a huge company that has spent ALOT of money on their Panasonic branding, it would hurt for them to put the badge on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 714
|
If I were Panny, I would seriously consider using "Lumix" (or some other name) for their high end and maybe "panasonic" for their consumer models ... They were also in electronics; and they used "Technics" for their hi-fi equipment and National/Panasonic for thie consumer models .... which is why I find it difficult to buy a "panasonic" high end photographic equipment ..... my hifi kakis sure will find many ways of making jokes out of it .... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: No dust, no auto focus area
Posts: 807
|
Their choices make a lot of sense. I had a cordless phone that was quite good and of course, it was very reliable. I did change out my Panasonic rice cooker for a Zojirushi but I trust Panasonic in almost everything they do now. I would suffer embarrassment, if I had a Toyota product, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,690
|
Isn't Panny the largest consumer electronics company in the world today, based on market capitalization (how'dya think they got Leica on board?)? (What's wrong with Toyota anyway?)
__________________
www.facebook.com/darrengyh |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,240
|
Ha ha.. interesting topic... But for me, brand name is not so important.. Canon also produce photocopier, printer, calculator etc... They use the same name for their camera & lenses too.. Somemore Panasonic is currently trying to build their brand name in DSLR market... give them sometimes, few years later, who knows ppl will be proud of owning a PANASONIC DSLR... My only concern is the name is too long.. ha ha Kidding kidding... |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 250
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the other side
Posts: 1,977
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|