![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,311
|
Hello all,
I'm thinking of starting out in MF photography with a TLR. Don't want something that'll break down or is unreliable, but can't afford a Rolleiflex, so I'm looking into a Rolleicord. Just some questions for the seniors here. 1) Is there a recommended model of Rolleicord to get? I've read that the Rolleicord III is a good sturdy model, so I'm aiming for that now. 2) Is there any other makes and models of TLRs do you recommend? I've heard about a Ikoflex that seems to be pretty good. Has anyone have any first hand experience of one? 3) Any tricks of the trade to learn while using a TLR? 4) I've found it hard to get a Rolleicord in Singapore. Anyone has any contacts, know where to get one or better yet, is willing to part with one? My budget is $200 - $300, low, but it's all I have. Thanks. Samuel Last edited by alternatve; 24th August 2007 at 02:19 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 354
|
Hi samuel,
Move into MF n you will never look back. 1. I think any Rolleicord III, IV or Va or Vb is a good choice. Personally i have the Vb. I chose the Vb cos easier to change the screen. 2. Probably you would like to try the Seagulls or the Yashicas. 3. Tricks.... its a slower process compare to SLR. 4. Maybe see any one selling in B&S or the 2nd hand shops in peninsula area. Or try to pick up a used Seagull to try try 1st. CHeers. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sg - bukit ho swee
Posts: 1,303
|
Ayo, don't need to think so hard, just do it. U need a lot more patience for old cameras.. if u r so used to digital bang bang bang, don't know how to shot without preview or AE.. then u better forget abt it. I bought a Rolleiflex 2.8F last weekend.. wonderful camera... ![]() Last edited by boochap; 24th August 2007 at 03:39 PM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,090
|
i got a seagull a while back too.. the square frame is quite different in terms of composition. and because there's no prism, framing is alittle tricky.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,311
|
![]() Where did you get your Rolleiflex from? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sg - bukit ho swee
Posts: 1,303
|
Leica IIIc..?! where u got it? can afford leica cannot rollei.. u must be joking. how about meet up for kopi to showoff these cameras? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,090
|
can i join you guys for coffee?
thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,311
|
That's why I don't have the cash to get a Rollei after a Leica. Else I can splurge on a 2.8 C or D. All overseas of course. Samuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 71
|
Get a rollei and never look back......I have both 2.8F and 2.8GX mint.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
|
1) Is there a recommended model of Rolleicord to get? I've read that the Rolleicord III is a good sturdy model, so I'm aiming for that now.
Personally i am using a Rolleicord Va which i got from a shop at penin next to the coffeeshop/food court. Dont remember the shop name it cost me 450 SGD( which is the street price in 2005) For the most part of it really seemed to be sturdy as hell, i exposed more than 70-80 rolls since late 2005 and it still going strong. Considering my model is made in 1957 it is impressive. 2) Is there any other makes and models of TLRs do you recommend? I've heard about a Ikoflex that seems to be pretty good. Has anyone have any first hand experience of one? I used to have a SEAGULL 4a which i bought new from MS color but it only last about 2 years before the winding crank started 'slipping'. Repairing aint worth it so i gave it to my repair man. Other TLR is the MAMIYA C330 is use when i was in school, it belonged to a friend but the only thing i remember is you can focus really really close( thanks to the bellows focusing) and it is a big as a loaf of gardenia bread. Yes you can change lens with that thing, but my friend only have one back then. Rolleicord is a better bet then the above 2 as it is a lot smaller and more reliable. For the most part of it it is no bigger than a AF SLR and slips in to bags easily. 3) Any tricks of the trade to learn while using a TLR? Left is right, right is left. The focusing screen is mirror image. but you will get use to it. First time i use a digital point and shoot i struggled quite a bit. lol. straighten out the pics by tilting the camera sideways. You will learn to hold the camera level after a roll or 2. Dont be afraid to zone focus and use the sports finder to shoot fast. it can be quite fun. Using a TLR for the most part of it means slowing down quite a bit and shooting less but it doesn't mean you cant do fast candid. No meter but If you are adept with your screw mount leica i think you can pull it off. 4) I've found it hard to get a Rolleicord in Singapore. Anyone has any contacts, know where to get one or better yet, is willing to part with one? My budget is $200 - $300, low, but it's all I have. Try the internet. Obscure |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 32
|
do u guys know where can i find a pretty mint rollei 2.8gx at reasonable pricing?
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land Downunder
Posts: 2,069
|
![]() These two are mutually exclusive as far Rolleiflexes are concerned. Well, go around the peninsula/adephi area in town and there are at least 3 shops that have Rolleiflexes/cords for sale. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land Downunder
Posts: 2,069
|
Samuel, you are better off getting the Rolleicords off the bay. For a start, why not try a good yashica or minolta? They are much cheaper. Pic quality not that far off from Rolleis.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 758
|
hi do you mean yashica MAT? any idea what is the price range? i heard some feedback that rolleicord is low cost product beside rolleiflex, and the glass isn't even same with rolleiflex, wonder how is the quality.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land Downunder
Posts: 2,069
|
No, the rolleicords are cheaper than the flexes mainly because because they are simpler to build due to the lack of the complex autosensing loading and crank-winding cum shutter recharge mechanism and also they came with cheaper (not necessarily inferior) Schneider optics rather than the Zeiss ones on the flexes. For easier maintenance, I think the "cheaper" cords make more sense. The cords used a straighforward press and turn knob which are less likely to fail especially on used sets on the Bay. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,311
|
Quite a old thread now, But I'm happy to report that I have a Minolta Autocord! Now, to test the sharpness of the legendary rokkor lens!
Samuel |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land Downunder
Posts: 2,069
|
I believe you will not be disappointed. TLR lenses are usually good. Even the very cheap ones, just close down to f/5.6 or smaller and you are OK. The Rokkor of course can do better.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 947
|
Get the Rolleicords instead of the Seagull... the Seagull does not deliver images that are consistently sharp... under a loupe u can see the edges are slightly blurred... Not to mention that Seagull prices have been on the rise, and if you get a Rolleicord at a reasonable price you can probably sell off for the same amount later!
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|