![]() |
|
|||||||
| Four Thirds Standard (4/3 and m43) Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds Discussions |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,956
|
More here: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...hread=24476785
More choices is good, the L10 looks very strong compared with the E-510, it has a tilt and swivel LCD! |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: No dust, no auto focus area
Posts: 802
|
For the likely price, it should have an articulated LCD display.
I'm sure they've learned a lot from the DMC-L1 and it'll be everything you'd expect in real life, not just on paper. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,956
|
This looks more like a prosumer budget model, albeit a highly spec prosumer one that will take on the likes of the Nikon D80 and Canon 400D. It looks just like the FZ30/50, which probably means very nice ergonomics. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,690
|
![]()
__________________
www.facebook.com/darrengyh |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 141
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
looks good, the slower kit lens is probably to lower the cost of the camera. flip out swivel screen is really good!
panasonic tradition of camera naming seems to follow onto their dslrs lineup: niche model / rangefinder styling: LC1 (prosumer) --> L1 (dslr) consumer friendly / modern slr styling: FZ10/20/30/50 (prosumer) --> L10 (dslr) still waiting for news on the leica D 14-150mm IS. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: No dust, no auto focus area
Posts: 802
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Novena
Posts: 128
|
A new body from Panasonic will be a boost to the credibility of the 4/3 system, particulalry if priced competitively. No mention of in-camera IS, which is a big selling point for the E510. So I assume they are sticking the Lens IS.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
the leica D 14-50 3.5/5.6 is an IS lens, can see the IS badge in the pic. panny will definately stick to lens IS since they have made quite a name for themselves with Mega OIS brand for the prosumer / consumer models.
its odd though, since it would have the same focal range as the earlier 2.8/3.5 leica D...would it would have the same lens barrel aperture control as with the 3 announced leica Ds. FZ series cameras has 2 control dials for aperture and shutter, so i wonder.... |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,690
|
If it isn't too expensive (read: below 400 smackers) I just might get it.
__________________
www.facebook.com/darrengyh |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
the L1 was priced way too high for its feature set...but the L1 was a niche product to begin with. the L10 is likely going to be priced competitively or panny will never capture any piece dslr market share with all the recent announcements from the other players.
i doubt i'll consider getting the new IS lens, no real benefit with the E510. still waiting for the 14-150mm...do it all walkabout lens... |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Novena
Posts: 128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
no idea...no sales info available...listed under lenses planned for release after 2007 on the four-thirds site. http://www.four-thirds.org/en/produc...ease/lens.html
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: No dust, no auto focus area
Posts: 802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
don't think the price of the L1 has dropped much here in singapore. well based on the leaked info, the L10 shares the same sensor as the L1 / E330, so it could be likely for the L10 to be priced close to the E510 / 410.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,456
|
How can it be the same sensor as the L1 when the L1's sensor is only 7.2M while the L10 is supposed to be 10M. Digitally increasing the resolution even if it is done in-camera is a no-no.
![]()
__________________
Fish Pics:http://www.pbase.com/pschia/oddballs IR Pics:http://www.pbase.com/pschia/infra_red |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,690
|
More likely the L10 will use the same sensor as the 410/510.
__________________
www.facebook.com/darrengyh |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: central
Posts: 1,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,329
|
The camera looks huge in that girl's hands. I dun think that it will be as light or as small as the 510.....
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|