Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Which one better for sports?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    681

    Default Which one better for sports?

    EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM or EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM.One one hand the 2.8 will allow more light in and a faster speed with lower iso.The f4 IS has IS which helps to keep the shakes away but not sure how much it'll help in night shots.My test shots would be like at local S league games which the only available light is the spotlights.Advice please thanks.And please i don't have the money for the 2.8 IS.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Volcano Land
    Posts
    2,351

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    Use a monopod

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    681

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    Use a monopod
    with the 2.8?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Legion
    Posts
    7,751

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    definitely f2.8... your IS is not gonna stabilizer the players out in the field running... etc

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Volcano Land
    Posts
    2,351

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    There is no replacement for a wider aperture when it comes to shooting sports

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    BUKIT PANJANG
    Posts
    1,997

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yatlapball View Post
    There is no replacement for a wider aperture when it comes to shooting sports
    i totally agree with wat that has been mentioned
    D800 | D700|16mm f2.8D|35 f1.4G|50 f1.8G|60mm F2.8D|85mm f1.4G|16-35 f4G|70-200 f2.8 VR2| SB900

  7. #7

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    Hi duinchlfc,

    Will you have side-line access? I ask because if not, a 70-200 may not be long enough if you're in the stands.

    I can't remember what body you're using, but if your cam performs ok with high ISOs like 1600 or 3200 (with some noise filtering software in post), personally speaking, you might want to consider the 100-400L. For shooting from the stands, the reach is invaluable. Also, for some reason or another, the 100-400L used seems to be available at fairly attractive prices from $1,400 - $1,900.

    What you could do is rent both lenses (should cost you less than $100 for both) and try them out at an actual game. It would save you a lot of grief and $$$ in the long run.

    CHEERS!

  8. #8

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    2.8 man.... but having said that 200mm isn't really long enough even on a 1.6x.... maybe you want to consider the 100-400 but this is 5.6 @ 400mm or you can try the sigma 120-300 2.8... 3k+ thou... normally i'm not a fan of 3rd party but the 300 2.8 is 7k+ so.....

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Volcano Land
    Posts
    2,351

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    If shooting from the stands... abit no point lah. The angles will not be very nice from up there.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    With my limited knowledge, I think a wider aperture beats IS. IS cannot give you back the f/stops you lose. Even with IS, you still might shake as it's a rather long lens. A tripod solves the problem nicely from you unless you want to run around here and there. In that case, use a monopod.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sengkang
    Posts
    681

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    thanks for the advice

  12. #12

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    With typical stadium lighting, you will get 1/160 ~ 1/250s, f/2.8 @ ISO 1600.

    You can stop the player in most instances, but not the ball.

    Shooting from the touchlines is not possible with the assistant referees in the way. There's also the danger of being hit by the ball/players and blocking the spectators.

    At 200mm from the goal line you'll only get shots in and around the penalty area. Any further and the shot will be very loose, you can't crop too much either due to the noise @ ISO 1600.

    Best bet is just to enjoy the game... =D

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    SINGAPORE
    Posts
    127

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    There is a great article on sports photography here: http://photo.net/learn/sports/overview

    I highly recommend reading this. Going back to your Question though I would guess you could try looking at a 70-200 with a tele converter x2. You will lose a stop with this setup but it will be one way to satisfy your need for reach. I highly recommend the 2.8 if possible. If you cannot afford the IS version then get a monopod.
    Even if you could afford the IS version there is a possibility that you will need to go monopod anyway since it is not light and if you are going to be out on a long day - you will need this option at some point.

    I have the 2.8 IS version and it is a love affair. This lens is just awesome in low light. I guess sometimes you have lenses that gel well with your style of shooting and this is one of those for me.

    Good Luck on your endeavors!

    David

  14. #14

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    The fella's shooting @ night.

    70-200 f/2.8 w/ 2x teleconverter?

    You're kiddin' aren't you?

    f/5.6, pitch illuminated only by the stadium lights?

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    SINGAPORE
    Posts
    127

    Default Re: Which one better for sports?

    OK - To be clear.

    I merely meant that the option exists to go to a 2x converter . This is not going to be the ultimate for night sports. Sorry if this confused.

    I guess your only option is go monopod and F4.

    Otherwise maybe look at Sigma : http://www.dpreview.com/news/0505/05...a_70-200mm.asp

    The price is suitable and you can get nice image from this too!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •