![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 70
|
Dear all,
I would like to ask if any of you notice or encountered that the color of photos taken with Canon 400D looks abit flat and not as vibrant as photos taken with nikon d80(my friend's cam). FYI i'm using canon 17-85mm lens. Not sure if i left out some settings or impt pts to take note. Pls feel free to drop your comments or opinion. Thanks. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 卧龙岗
Posts: 2,658
|
taken your pics with Adobe RGB maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 544
|
you can make your picture as vibrant as your friend's cam....custom function, up the settings...you need to compare apple to apple...
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Get to it through the menus, what you can do is scroll down to one of the user defined settings, then press "jump" to fine tune the settings of that user defined custom function. You can up the saturation. Last edited by calebk; 7th August 2007 at 12:27 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,457
|
try this: saturation : +2 contrast: -1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,457
|
shooting in adobe RGB is generally not recommended unless you intend to do alot of post prosessing and even then one would save the jpg after PP in sRBG.... saving in adobe RBG will give you even more washed out colors when viewed using a typical image browser.....
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Changi
Posts: 4,376
|
As many have mentioned it's quite hard to compare like that. Anyhow, using photoshop or another suitable PP software, you can usually get colours to look the same no matter which camera they came out from with a little bit of skill involved.
If you don't wish to process your image, you can try fiddling with the picture styles or in-camera saturation/contrast/sharpness settings to get your desired output. Be aware though that too much in-camera sharpening can lead to some pretty bad jpeg artifacts, so try not to overdo it on the in-camera tweaking.
__________________
My Personal Folio (of random events and things) |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,256
|
First of all, Does the pics you are comparing with taken in the same scene at same exposure?
Lighting conditions makes a lot of diff too |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 74
|
lens play the big factor
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,457
|
lens play a minor factor....
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 78
|
Any expert tweak their picture style's settings? Can share their information on that?
Maybe newbie like me can learn from that. ![]()
__________________
My Humble-Loft |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 78
|
all right...thx i will try hehe
__________________
My Humble-Loft |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 280
|
Hey, i do believe lens play a part, but honestly not 100% on that.
That said, http://forums.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=301909 Shot that with a 400D, using default standard picture style settings. I though it was pretty gd considering the only thing i did to that pic was compress from RAW to JPG ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|