![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CCK-Yew Tee
Posts: 1,713
|
I saw lots of nikon owner selling off all their lenses and joining the white side... I guess they must be after the FF system... Why nikon had yet to come out 1... Do they koe what are they missing? If they do come out guess what their selling price for their FF body? Will it be as 'cheap as Mark5'. or Nikon had not earn enough money for their D2x so they are just delaying time?
![]() Maybe its really time to switch camp.... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of the Vegetables
Posts: 2,958
|
Erhmmm... has your Nikon setup suddenly failed to take the quality images that made you a Nikon user in the first place?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northerner
Posts: 3,971
|
From the camera market point of view they might be somewat slower than the other camp.
But doesn affect me ![]() You affected by the delayed in FF ? Cheers ryan |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore (SengKang)
Posts: 2,992
|
Not too concerned about full frame.. I am happy with my 1.5x.. need wider just use the 12-24mm.. what is the problem ?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nee Soon
Posts: 460
|
I doubt that most of those who switch to Canon did it because they absolutely need FF.
Anyway, when (not if) Sony can make FF (or near FF) sized sensors at a reasonable price, then you will see FF on Nikon. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
|
Err... do you like to be spending money keep upgrading when your equipments is more than adequate for your usage?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Punggol
Posts: 839
|
I am looking forward to malaysia's National Day.......
__________________
Nikon D3FXMarkIIIDS-1H with 5000mm f/1.0 & 17-5000mm f/0.5 & 900mm Macro f/0.4 & 70-2000mm f/0.8 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 190
|
FF doesn't affect me and so, even FF is here i dun think i can affort it rite now or new future.
But i belive some body will back to dark camp. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 909
|
If you want to switch camp, better do it quietly. You ask so much sure get blasted, esp in Nikon forum. FF is very tempting but too high a cost for me to switch.
BTW, i noticed quite a lot of people selling canon lens f/4 zoom mainly. What say you now? |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 350
|
Seeing the IQ of 5D and 1Ds images, I would welcome the introduction of FF in Nikon bodies, esp if they can resolve the vignetting issue. But no need to switch to the dark side (or the white side) lah -- I have a good number of AF-D lenses and don't rely too much on DX lenses.
At the end of the day, it is good to have more choices. Even if Nikon introduces FF cameras, I fully expect them to continue to develop and support their DX range of cameras, just as Canon has done so -- you have the 30Ds, 400Ds, etc existing alongside 5Ds, 1Ds Mk3, etc. More choices = good for the consumer. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 909
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: near the Equator
Posts: 1,257
|
There's always the alternative called film. Natural FF.
![]()
__________________
We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities. - Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East
Posts: 10,962
|
Do YOU really need the FF?
Or just interested due to the hype? There's always the film cameras as suggested above but do remember the bigger the sensor, the higher the cost of everything... The LENS must be top condition else, edge sharpness and other issues will show up VERY clearly. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 402
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,267
|
FF or not, i believe the concern is that FF delivers better noise performance but this will also have to do with photosite size and design, not just cuz its FF.
really need FF? shoot film first lor, nice big 35mm. if nikon's d200x has superb usable iso 3200, FF or not i dont care, 1.5x also fine, as long as i can snap indoors faster
__________________
chezburgr i can haz? |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,476
|
I agree with majere2sg, do you really need such a wide angle?
__________________
Nikon & Fujifilm - Havin' the Best of both World - my flickr! |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|