![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 358
|
Hi Guys,
Planning to get the Speedlite 430Ex because the internal flash creates a shadow at 10-18mm on the efs10-22mm. But I saw from the specs that the 430Ex can only do wide angle coverage to 14mm. No way to cover 10-13mm?? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 126
|
hi! i have the exact setup (10-22mm + 430ex) and it covers my photos even if i am at 10mm. i think it depends on how much you're expecting... the results are pretty decent i say.
![]() Last edited by anneanne; 31st July 2007 at 02:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central West
Posts: 1,913
|
Do note that the quoted flash coverage is for 35mm equivalent. So your 10-22mm on your crop sensor is actually 16-35mm - easily covered by the flash.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 873
|
if you bounce flash correctly, there is confirm no vignet on the 10-22 =)
__________________
http://stratixfied.deviantart.com |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
No you won't. 14mm coverage is assuming you are on FF. If you consider the angle of view of a 10-22mm, it is similar to a 16-35mm on FF, which the 430EX can cover properly. That said, none of the other flashes Canon has will cover anything wider than 14mm (FF equiv) anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 873
|
__________________
http://stratixfied.deviantart.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tanah Merah
Posts: 606
|
Well, ya, the coverage is all in FF equivalent, so effectively the 10-22 on a 1.6x crop body will give 16mm, which the 430ex can cover with the pull-down diffuser panel. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|