![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
Recently found a weird issue on the AF for my EF 85mm F/1.8 lens.
When using outdoors, the AF is working perfectly. But indoors, when the focusing distance is about 1m, the lens always back-focuses. anybody has this issue before? thanks
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,411
|
were you exceeding the minimum focusing distance, and therefore, in an attempt to press shutter, accidentally focus to somewhere behind the subject? Outdoor, you probably stepped back a bit, indoor no spce?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 873
|
if it's too dark, you probably need the AF assistance from your flash to get an accurate AF. =)
__________________
http://stratixfied.deviantart.com |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
I used a tripod, and the distance is 1m > 0.85m (min focusing distance)
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
Yes, I tried that too, but still back-focusing
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,411
|
a trip down to Harbor Front!
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 744
|
This is indeed weird, however not totally impossible. I have encountered such behaviour with other lenses at my work place.
Try this: Shoot a brightly lit target that has high contrast (say black and white stripes) at 1m, and again the same target under same lighting conditions at (about) 4.2m. Use only f/1.8. Reset the distance scale to infinity before taking each shot. Press the shutter release button only once to allow the AF to lock-on -- don't press a few times to let AF to re-adjust itself. Take 5-6 shots at each distance and check to see if it has a tendency to front/back focus. I dropped my 85mm f/1.8 and ever since it became persistent and consistent back focus. It's now semi-dismantled and I'm trying to fix it. Last edited by Jemapela; 25th July 2007 at 06:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
forgot to mention this:
I did bring this lens to Canon service center, guess what? they said the lens is functioning perfectly! So I took several shots there and showed them the back-focusing issue. They couldn't provide any explanation but said again and again the lens is OK and the focusing will be precise outdoors (and it does so I just leave it that way)
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: BUKIT PANJANG
Posts: 1,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
Yeah, but I tried in outdoors, it does fucoses perfectly most of the time, even at aperture wide open.
any other user care to take a test?
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 744
|
Try the test method I described, and describe your findings, that is, how back is it at 1m and at 4.2m.
Actually, I'm not surprised if you detect this phenomena with other Canon lenses. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
tried it, about 0.5cm back when at 1m, and acurate at ~4m
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
do you mean this phenomena is common in canon lense? why is that?
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 744
|
I don't know if it's common but I have noticed it before.
However, do bear in mind that at near distances, as in your case at 1m, your depth of field is shallow, hence errors in the AF become more prominent. At further distances say 5m, the depth of field is deeper, hence errors in the AF is less prominent. I'm quite sure your less also back focuses at further distances but the back focus is less obvious due to depth of field. Back focusing by 0.5cm sounds quite significant to me but Canon does allow tolerances in AF errors. I'm not sure if this is within the tolerance. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
thanks, I will do more test outdoors and see how it goes.
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sembawang SG/Salaya Thailand
Posts: 1,365
|
Hi bro Xavier, regarding back focusing, perhaps you could perform a test.
Download the PDF document from the provided link and follow the instructions. http://www.nikonware.com/files/FocusChart.pdf This was initially created to test Nikon cameras and lenses for back/front focusing issues, however the procedure applies to all cameras. Perhaps you could give it a try to get a feel of how bad your back/front focusing is. Of course, the test results are just approximates, dun rely too much on it. Best to confirm that its the AF prob then bring your lens and camera to canon for servicing. Hope this works for you. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NUS
Posts: 425
|
thanks a lot!
__________________
EOS 5D Mark II / 17-40 F/4 L / 50mm F/1.4 / 135mm F/2 L / 430EX Mark II + LSII |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|