![]() |
|
|||||||
| Rangefinders and Compacts For the 35mm purists |
|
|
| View Poll Results: What B&W film is preferred for street photography? | |||
| TMax |
|
31 | 18.45% |
| Tri-X |
|
71 | 42.26% |
| Neopan |
|
24 | 14.29% |
| HP5+ |
|
33 | 19.64% |
| FP4+ |
|
9 | 5.36% |
| Delta Pro |
|
16 | 9.52% |
| Others |
|
31 | 18.45% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 168. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 271
|
Just wanted to have a simple rough poll to see locally what B&W films are popular in usage. The poll can't capture everything, especially different ISO preference within the same brand of films, and I probably missed out other brands available in Singapore.
Hope there'll be some open sharing on personal choices. Since it's personal, it is expected to be subjective. So far I've only tried Neopan 400 and Tri-X 400 at EI400 and prefer Neopan for its finer grain. Am moving ahead to try out HP5+ and TMax.
__________________
"...not taking what one doesn't desire is the hardest thing in the world" - Albert Camus Last edited by centurion_sg; 27th June 2007 at 04:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bogor - West Java
Posts: 77
|
TMAX, are they covering TMX, TMY and TMZ ?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York*New Jersey*Boston
Posts: 1,074
|
.xp2.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,378
|
definitely tri-x. 2nd choice would be hp5. Hardly use the 100 speed films as they are quite hard to use indoors. Possible, but hard.... Tri-x allows me to push till 6400 with stand developing
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 271
|
I was lost on this question, and did an online search and figured TMX, TMY, and TMZ refer to TMax ISO100, 400, and 3200. Glad you pointed out so I could learn more
I guess it would not be fair to use "TMax" to cover all three types even though its under the same product brand. At the moment, I'll be trying the TMY.
__________________
"...not taking what one doesn't desire is the hardest thing in the world" - Albert Camus |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,378
|
i think tmax, is the new name where they call themselves TMAX 100, TMAX400, TMAX3200. In the past, it used to be called TMX, TMY, TMZ. In generally they all have T-grain if i'm not mistaken. Don't normally use them.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Singapore
Posts: 487
|
I've tried the ilford ones as well as tmax but there's just something about tri-x that I just like. Can't really say what it is. Maybe it's a combination of the grain and contrast
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land Downunder
Posts: 2,069
|
I just use whatever I happen to have in the fridge, which at this time is TMAX100, which I develop in Diafine, which automatically gets pushed to EI400.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 355
|
Kodak 400cn. Chromogenic film that can be processed in c41. Love the results from it and really easy to scan. Can pussh all the way to 1600 no problem at all. The black and white stuff on my blog from Europe, www.39voices.blogspot.com is all shot on Kodak 400cn.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 271
|
You mean you instructed the labs to push process C41 or did you mean you exposed it up to +2 stops?
__________________
"...not taking what one doesn't desire is the hardest thing in the world" - Albert Camus |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 73
|
Is Neopan available in Singapore?
__________________
http://monsoonphoto.net |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 271
|
Yes, I know Neopan 400 is available from Konota at Peninsula Plaza.
__________________
"...not taking what one doesn't desire is the hardest thing in the world" - Albert Camus |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,090
|
i like triX if the light is a little low, as it looks great after pushing alittle. if not, ilford pan 400 does perfectly fine. how's neopan compared to triX?
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 388
|
Tri-X for me. I keep a few rolls of FP4+ just in case for daytime shoot, but for available light... Tri-X will do just fine pushed to 1600.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
|
1.Tri-x
2.HP5 3. Lucky SHD100 when im on a tight budget ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,249
|
i fell in love with neopan 1600 >_<
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CCK
Posts: 115
|
Same here! (:
Relatively 'fine' grain at ISO 1600 developed in T-max developer. I think the FP4 is better for contrast, but it's only ISO 125. Never tried pushing it |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: www.fuzzyeyeballs.com
Posts: 6,719
|
__________________
fuzzyeyeballs |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,695
|
Neopan 400 and Acros 100 for me... Acros is by far my favourite B&W film.
Not sure why but never been too big a fan off heavy grain. |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 528
|
XP2, which is not in the options.
Next will be HP5+ and lately TMax400 because everything else was out of stock a while back! |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|