![]() |
|
|||||||
| Underwater Photography All things nautically & photographically related. Dive in!! |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: singapore, Jurong
Posts: 105
|
I never go snapshot underwater but going to.
Before i buy any equipment, would like to check first before i buy wrong thing. Now i have canon 350 and 580EX What i know strobe is a continuousness light shining on objects.( am i right?) Somehow, i read, 580EX as a strobe? how a flash become a strobe?? thanks PLUS. If i want to buy another Aim and shoot underwater camera, should i buy Canon SD850 ( 950 IS ) or Olympus Stylus 780 why i consider them because canon = scene setting got underwater canon = not water proof, i not sure shop now got sell UW casing??? Olympus = waterproof, olympus = don't have scene setting for underwater, i not sure the correct white balance and setting. I copy and paste this pics, Not from me, but hope i won't get this kind of sample lighting ![]() Last edited by letdoit; 25th June 2007 at 11:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Deep Deep in the sea
Posts: 3,235
|
Hi
welcome to the underwater world point and shoot is never ideal for underwater, even with underwater mode, condition underwater varies and the water makes metering a tedious task for the camera. so Shooting in Auto mode usually ends up in suicidal Knowing the fundamentals of underwater photography usually helps, without this you can go down with a D2Xs and still shoot crappy photos I think flash is continuous, not strobe some people has shot very lovely photos with continuous light (flash light) We use strobe I would recommend a Canon A640 with Ikelite Housing + a Inon D2000s check Oceanic Focus for details on the strobes hope it helps ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 274
|
Strobe is only good for distance less than 2m, beyond that you just gonna get the kind of picture you post. To get good pictures, you need to get as close to the subjects as possible. If you wanna shoot far, you have to depend on the visibility and the amount of ambient light.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: singapore, Jurong
Posts: 105
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 274
|
Flash or strobe is just the same thing with different name. If you talking about continuous light then I think you are referring to torchlight, which is called flashlight in US and Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Deep Deep in the sea
Posts: 3,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: singapore, Jurong
Posts: 105
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Deep Deep in the sea
Posts: 3,235
|
cos of poor color, slow focus, weak flash, limited controls
I wouldn't bet my last $ on it. i would settle for a canon A640 with their Canon housing(although i'll spend a little more for a likelite housing) is less then 1k, just look at barracuda's thread No body said underwater photography is cheap |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 12
|
I wouldn't choose the Oly either - only auto and scene modes will greatly reduce what you can do with it. The colours are generally not as good as the Canons - speaking from personal experience at least. Waterproof is okay if a camera gets wet on the surface but if the housing leaks under pressure at depth then sea water is still likely to find its way into the body
The Canons are better in that they usually have at least shutter and aperture priority modes and manual white balance - the underwater mode feature is not much of an advantage to be honest. The A640 is nice in that it's small and can do a decent enough job but if I were you I'd save the money and house your 350 instead. If you're looking to get a strobe as well then you should expect to get better lighting than the one posted ( no disrespect to the person who took it but it's not lit properly at all). Strobes are what underwater flash units are referred to as. The principal advantage of them is that they are away from the camera so their positioning, and often their power settings, can be adjusted to make better use of the conditions. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 12
|
I wouldn't choose the Oly either - only auto and scene modes will greatly reduce what you can do with it. The colours are generally not as good as the Canons - speaking from personal experience at least. Waterproof is okay if a camera gets wet on the surface but if the housing leaks under pressure at depth then sea water is still likely to find its way into the body
The Canons are better in that they usually have at least shutter and aperture priority modes and manual white balance - the underwater mode feature is not much of an advantage to be honest. The A640 is nice in that it's small and can do a decent enough job but if I were you I'd save the money and house your 350 instead. If you're looking to get a strobe as well then you should definitely expect to get better lighting than the one posted ( no disrespect to the person who took it but it's not lit properly). Strobes are what underwater flash units are referred to as. The principle advantage of them is that they are away from the camera so their positioning, and often their power settings, can be adjusted to make better use of the conditions. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sembawang
Posts: 3
|
I would definitely encourage you to buy a housing for your 350D. I use a housed Canon Powershot S70 and even with an Inon D2000 strobe, the photos are still not very satisfactory. My friend has a 350D with Ikelite housing and Ikelite 125 strobe, and his photos look so much better. Focusing speed, interchangeable lenses, speed of writing to RAW format, etc., etc. Really makes a difference. Go get a housing for S$2K and a strobe for about $900 and you will enjoy much better underwater photos.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 13
|
i using olympus! not exactly will regret.. but i must say its good for macro. as in with the super macro feature, with normal flash. effect is good, probably because of good vis. heh
but one thing bad about olympus for underwater is the batt's life. i change batt each dive. and with the silicon thingy in the casing doesnt help much to prevent fogging either. urgh. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|