Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: No More Flashes? (if someone has posted this, lemme know. i'll delete.)

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SengKang
    Posts
    628

    Default No More Flashes? (if someone has posted this, lemme know. i'll delete.)

    http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/devlin/11619

    Kodak's New Sensor May Eliminate Flash
    Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:58PM EDT
    See Comments (9)
    Imagine...no red eye. Period. Or no need for a flash on a digital camera.

    Now that digital camera makers have come up with all kinds of ways to eliminate red eye and improve flash technology while stabilizing images, Kodak says it is developing digital technology that will nearly eliminate the need for a flash (and the oft-accompanying red eye) and improve performance in low-light conditions.

    Here's how it would work: The new technology would increase light sensitivity of existing image sensors by two to four times. That means a camera's shutter speed could be cut in half, or at least a quarter, which would reduce camera shake and blurring problems. If it works, it also would allow photographers to shoot in low light without producing grainy, speckled photos.

    The proof is in the pixels. In most digital cameras, each sensor pixel detects either the color red, green, or blue and places them into a pattern named for Bryce Bayer, the Kodak engineer who developed it. With the new high-sensitivity technology, half of the pixels will be panchromatic, or clear, so they will capture only the brightness, not color. That means a 12-megapixel camera would have 6 million panchromatic pixels, 3 million green pixels, 1.5 million red pixels, and 1.5 million blue pixels. In comparison, today's 12-megapixel cameras have 6 million green pixels, 3 million red, and 3 million.

    The announcement is Kodak's latest big play in an intense bid to rebuild into a digital photography company as its film business dwindles. The company's plan is to make use of its proprietary intellectual property, including this image sensor technology, to compete in the crowded digicam market. Kodak entered the printer business this year with models that are slightly higher priced than competitors' but use ink that retails for about half the cost of other cartridges.

    Kodak will build its own cameras with the new technology, but it also plans to sell it to other manufacturers since it works with existing image sensors. The new tech will be available in early 2008, but Kodak has given no word on when the first cameras with it fully built in will be on the market.

    On each page in my photo albums of the kids since they were little, there's at least one photo besmirched by red eyes, the scourge of the snap shooter. More and more cameras are including tools to remove red eye in camera, while even the most amateur among us have become pretty adept at removing the demonizing glare with tools on photo software, online photo ordering sites, and in-store kiosks. But built-in technology that eliminates the need to tinker before and post shooting would be a welcome feature in a digital camera.

    Is this the kind of feature you've been waiting for in a digital camera?

  2. #2

    Default Re: No More Flashes? (if someone has posted this, lemme know. i'll delete.)

    yay! I think there will be more and more similar innovations in the future so we can save more money and have more features!

    For one I wish to have a remote LCD so I can mount my camera at one spot, monitor it using the LCD and press shoot on the touch screen LCD! Then we will all don't have to crowd during fireworks

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Outside the Dry Box.
    Posts
    16,374

    Default Re: No More Flashes? (if someone has posted this, lemme know. i'll delete.)

    Quote Originally Posted by zhangyb View Post
    yay! I think there will be more and more similar innovations in the future so we can save more money and have more features!

    For one I wish to have a remote LCD so I can mount my camera at one spot, monitor it using the LCD and press shoot on the touch screen LCD! Then we will all don't have to crowd during fireworks
    then i'll imagine alot of ppl wearing shoes bigger than ronald macdonald already...
    Logging Off. "You have 2,631 messages stored, of a total 400 allowed." don't PM me.

  4. #4

    Default Re: No More Flashes? (if someone has posted this, lemme know. i'll delete.)

    This certainly doesn't replace a real flash for fill-flash situations

  5. #5

    Default Re: No More Flashes? (if someone has posted this, lemme know. i'll delete.)

    We'll probably have to wait 2-3 years more before a stable marketable version hits the shelves as a complete product. Not sure if by that time, existing CCD/CMOS sensor designs and noise-suppression algorithms/circuitry would have improved enough to rival it. Could be faster if Kodak has already been working with camera makers as to how to integrate that new CCD into their systems.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Pablo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Blue/Green Planet
    Posts
    1,859

    Default Re: No More Flashes? (if someone has posted this, lemme know. i'll delete.)

    Are we being robbed of resolution this way

    O.T. I like the word,"besmirched" . I hadn't heard that one before
    Time, is an effortless construction :)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •