Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

  1. #1

    Default Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    How does the sigma 70-300 compare with the pentax 50-200?

    sharing a link on summary of pentax lens

    http://wiki.nerdylorrin.net/wiki/Wik...e=CameraLenses

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Balestier
    Posts
    2,052

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by lizzy View Post
    How does the sigma 70-300 compare with the pentax 50-200?

    sharing a link on summary of pentax lens

    http://wiki.nerdylorrin.net/wiki/Wik...e=CameraLenses
    DA 50-200 is sharper & AF is faster. Sigma more functions but QC is not constant, so not all lens are sharp. This question like every month also see one

  3. #3

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Not sure if the 50-200 is good, but I've been using a borrowed copy of 70-300 macro version for a while now, mainly for macros, I like the range and the fact that it -is- macro, albeit fake-macro and 2:1 ratio.

    A little soft on the 200-300 end yes, but I've taken a few potshots from 70-200 and it's pretty sharp. Good if you like to take butterflies and dragonflies, and don't need those longko-style large large bug eye shots.. =D Would post a few pictures, but sharpness issue not that visible at this size anyways.
    Last edited by night86mare; 12th June 2007 at 10:47 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Balestier
    Posts
    2,052

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by night86mare View Post
    don't need those longko-style large large bug eye shots.. =D
    Ya the more magnification the better

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Yew Tee
    Posts
    944

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Lens is good to me, but the only complaint is the hood which is easily scratchable.
    Birds Of Singapore Android App released!
    the mac 13 on Flickr

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Seng Kang
    Posts
    963

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by longko View Post
    Ya the more magnification the better
    Think longko is aiming for the day he can capture the individual cells in the bug's eye...

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Balestier
    Posts
    2,052

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by alanswan View Post
    Think longko is aiming for the day he can capture the individual cells in the bug's eye...
    Nah I'll be happy if I can get 3-5:1 macro handheld But before that, I need to go back to basic again. My shots lacks life again

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sin Jia Por
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    I have been using the Sigma 70-300mm for the last 6 mths when i bought it. Its a good lens but its not as sharp as the others. The good thing about it is that its more compact and lightweight than Similar nikon or canon lenses.

    This the lens I use when I need to travel with minimal gear for work. Great Shots and it lets me even take MACRO at 200-300mm. It has never let me down yet.

    However the Zoom ring gets abit loose over time. When it was new it would not extend out by itself if you held it upright but over time it thens to slip out by itself.

    Anyway overall good lens, quality good, size & weight very good, made in JAPAN and best of all price point; less than S$350. MS colour selling at S$330.
    Perception is a state of mind, we see what we want to see.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    thanks guys for your valuable inputs.

    anyone know it's performance against sigma 18-200? i am thinking of replacing it with 17-70 + 70-300 combo, so if the 70-200 range is sharper than the 18-200, i think i will go for it...

  10. #10

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by longko View Post
    Nah I'll be happy if I can get 3-5:1 macro handheld But before that, I need to go back to basic again. My shots lacks life again
    I think for that the best way is to have a dedicated macro shooting setup... canon 350D, Canon's 5:1 lens, and a ring flash

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Balestier
    Posts
    2,052

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by dnaxe View Post
    I think for that the best way is to have a dedicated macro shooting setup... canon 350D, Canon's 5:1 lens, and a ring flash
    Don't want. No SR I lazy to take tripod/monopod everywhere liao. Besides I seriously prefer K10D over other below 2k cameras

  12. #12

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by lizzy View Post
    thanks guys for your valuable inputs.

    anyone know it's performance against sigma 18-200? i am thinking of replacing it with 17-70 + 70-300 combo, so if the 70-200 range is sharper than the 18-200, i think i will go for it...
    I suspect that it will be - although I don't own both so it's hard to tell.

    Here are a couple of sigma 70-300 shots (no PP - but resized down by picasa):

    http://picasaweb.google.com/alexande...87246765357874
    http://picasaweb.google.com/alexande...87813701041106
    http://picasaweb.google.com/alexande...87500168428418

    (actually, everything in any of my albums which has a focal length of 70 to 300 is from the sigma 70-300 - I don't own any other glass in that range)
    You haven't been happy with your 18-200?

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sin Jia Por
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Using telephoto lenses one has to give up something over the other.
    Prime lenses (which are fixed 35mm or 50mm, etc) usually give the sharpest and clearest shots.
    Telephoto lenses usually sacrifice some sharpness and clarity and sometimes there are some aberrations (u are lucky is it is not that noticeable, especially on good quality lenses).
    However, the biggest plus for tele lenses is the fact that they can help you take shots of different focal lenghts.

    The actual truth is today photo bugs are really really spoilt for choice! I remember using only 35mm or 50mm lenses to take shots. Long focal lens or telephoto lenses were really astronomical in price and difficult to get.
    So up to you, choose well. And for your info, some of the best photos in the world were taken
    by prime lenses 70mm or less, usually 35mm. Think about it.
    Perception is a state of mind, we see what we want to see.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by dnaxe View Post
    I suspect that it will be - although I don't own both so it's hard to tell.

    Here are a couple of sigma 70-300 shots (no PP - but resized down by picasa):

    http://picasaweb.google.com/alexande...87246765357874
    http://picasaweb.google.com/alexande...87813701041106
    http://picasaweb.google.com/alexande...87500168428418

    (actually, everything in any of my albums which has a focal length of 70 to 300 is from the sigma 70-300 - I don't own any other glass in that range)
    You haven't been happy with your 18-200?
    for travel, i think the 18-200 has a very versatile range without changing lens

    but i am thinking of getting better quality lens (without bursting my budget) when going for dedicated photo shoots. 17-70 is the main reason for changing my setup, 70-300 is to cover the remaining range

  15. #15

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    tested 70-300 and i am impress

    300mm 100% crop

  16. #16

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    I like this lens. Its sharp at 70-200mm. My only problem is the slow focus and sometimes it can't focus at all. Overall rating is for the price, sharp and lightweight.


    Sigma 70-300mm APO



  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Balestier
    Posts
    2,052

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by lizzy View Post
    tested 70-300 and i am impress

    300mm 100% crop
    That's a sharp copy Better grab it fast

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Woodlands
    Posts
    1,139

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    here are some samples of how my sigma 70-300 performs... considering that this was shot in a very poor lighting... taken from the recent Top model of the world at Millenia walk...




  19. #19

    Default Re: Is the Sigma 70-300 good?

    Quote Originally Posted by longko View Post
    That's a sharp copy Better grab it fast
    it is already in my hands

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •