![]() |
|
|||||||
| General, Reviews, Tech Talk Share tips & tricks, techniques, general photography chat. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 960
|
Just wondering if using multiple exposure on SLR, can it have some HDR effect?
Thanks! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 8,282
|
yah, HDR makes use of multiple exposure of the same composition to create high dynamic range. but if you mean multiple exposure of altered composition ie. with a moving subject, might be difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hougang
Posts: 1,601
|
as in two or more exposures on a single frame of film? you'll just get an overexposed image..
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 960
|
Sorry, I actually meant film. So, it is possible to have a HDR-like image using multiple exposure when shooting flim, by exposing 2 or more times on the same frame? ...I thought it was possible since the second or the third exposure are layered together with the first with reduced opacity? |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 8,282
|
does not know film darkroom techniques. theoretically, you need to reduce the exposure of each frame so that when add on, they would not become overexposed. even for digital, HDR also makes use of different opacity of different layers.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hougang
Posts: 1,601
|
but doesn't film already have a higher dynamic range than digital? or am I wrong..
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 960
|
No..not increasing the exposure time, that's not really multiple exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 8,282
|
but not as wide as HDR
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,786
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 960
|
Hmm...I still don't think so, but must try. Multiple exposure won't overexpose the same film lar... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pioneer
Posts: 1,397
|
It won't make any difference to the dynamic range. On film, the only way to increase dynamic range is to selectively expose - eg. using gradual ND filters, or multiple exposures with careful covering of part of the lens (is this practical?). If you'd like to think in Photoshop - it's like stacking layers in SCREEN mode. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Woodlands
Posts: 767
|
It's possible. You take the first frame of the landscape with the exposure setting of the landscape, while covering the scene of the sky. Without forwarding the film, you cover up the lower half of the scene, and expose for the sky. That way you can actually HDR.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
exposed the same frame with same exposure 3 time, in over 1 1/2 stops. exposed the same frame with same exposure 4 time, in over 2 stops. exposed the same frame with same exposure 8 time, in over 3 stops. HDR effect is using digital post production, you can't do that on film you can't do multiple exposure on film to get HDR effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,794
|
that, is call masking, one of the photography special effect on film day.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|