![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: yewtee.
Posts: 152
|
hi peeps!
i need some help here! do i still need a wide angle zoom lens AF Zoom-Nikkor 24-50mm f/3.3-4.5D when my current set up is a 18-55mm and a vivitar zoom 70-300mm lens? I do not want to make a rash decision just simply because it's a wide angle zoom lens? 1.am i right to say that my 18-55mm has a better focal length than the 24-50mm? 2.currently i have a offer selling a second hand 24-50mm at $300? is it worth it? 3. is the wide angle nikkor 24-50mm any good? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Singapore, Central
Posts: 626
|
1.Yes
2.No 3.Not much meaning to get the 24-50mm. You can get better value for your $300. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 590
|
that range is not here or there
unless u telling me u getting the 28-70, that is something diff |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tanah Merah
Posts: 218
|
Just basing purely on zoom range, I don't feel you need the 24-50mm. Your current 18-55mm is sufficient.
Last edited by tony_teo; 7th June 2007 at 08:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ClubSNAP community
Posts: 2,783
|
Since you already have the 18-55, you are already better off than to waste money on a 24-50.
And you'd be surprised what a 18-55 can do. Learn to work the most out of it. It is a great lens. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: in your mind
Posts: 19,293
|
BBB syndrome!
You already have the range covered with your 18-55, why do you want a 24-50 where there is an overlap in the range? 24-50 even more restrictive than 18-55 too. Better to get something like a 50-200 or 70-300, or a 10-20 or 12-24 if you're thinking of going telephoto in the former case, or going wider in the latter case. 24-50 with assuming 1.5x crop factor is not wide at all, imho, gives you 35mm equivalent of 36-75. Of course the question is begging - do you really need another lens, and why so? If you can give yourself a logical answer which is acceptable, then go for it if you have the financial means. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere near a chinese lake
Posts: 1,109
|
Stick with your 18-55mm lens, it is a more useful range for your camera. If you really want a super wide angle lens, then you should be looking at lenses in the 10-22mm range.
__________________
My Flickr Gallery |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: big tree town
Posts: 1,640
|
i don think u will need the 24-50. no point. unless that 24-50 can do wonders.
if u are really itching to change to some other lenses, i suggest u sell off ur 18-55 to get the 18-70 (IMHO a better kit lense, but of course not a good upgrade option). have fun!
__________________
cameras are not made of tofu Last edited by Fotophilic; 7th June 2007 at 04:45 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|