Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Baby's stare

  1. #1

    Default Baby's stare

    My niece was staring at me while I was talking some photos outside the window..so i decided to take her photo..


  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    west side!
    Posts
    725

    Default Re: Baby's stare

    ooo nice big eyes.
    too bad for the reflection.
    pic seems a bit underexposed and the wb seems off.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Baby's stare

    What did you do to distort her original facade?
    Im guessing Curves, Contrast, Desaturate, USM filter?

    Oh dear. Thats like an overkill i say.
    Canon 40D, 10-22, 35, 70-200
    http://theserialhobbyist.multiply.com

  4. #4

    Default Re: Baby's stare

    Quote Originally Posted by tribal.snake View Post
    ooo nice big eyes.
    too bad for the reflection.
    pic seems a bit underexposed and the wb seems off.
    thanks..which reflection are you referring to?
    did some post processing to bring out more the details, curves, hair, shades of the face

  5. #5

    Default Re: Baby's stare

    Quote Originally Posted by munkey View Post
    What did you do to distort her original facade?
    Im guessing Curves, Contrast, Desaturate, USM filter?

    Oh dear. Thats like an overkill i say.

    thanks...is it overkill? i did a couple of things..high pass filter, usm, layer multiply..
    there is this workflow..which brings out the details, curves, outline of a face..

  6. #6

    Default Re: Baby's stare

    no offence but is it the PP or does your niece have alot of hair??

    the skin tone doesn't look natural to me and it doesn't seem to have the glow that I would imagine a baby would have?

  7. #7

    Default Re: Baby's stare

    Quote Originally Posted by halcy0n View Post
    no offence but is it the PP or does your niece have alot of hair??

    the skin tone doesn't look natural to me and it doesn't seem to have the glow that I would imagine a baby would have?

    My sentiments exact. Overkill i say.
    Canon 40D, 10-22, 35, 70-200
    http://theserialhobbyist.multiply.com

  8. #8

    Default Re: Baby's stare

    yup..she does have quite alot of hair..well maybe this technique does not work for babies.. maybe better for glamour shots..
    thanks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •