Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Wat image quality do u guys used?

  1. #1
    Member nivlaOof's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    little.RED.dot
    Posts
    1,102

    Default Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Hi guys,
    juz like to find out from u guys wat image quality do u guys used? does it make a huge diff between those choices?
    and BTW wat is the different btw Raw and JPEG?

    Wat software do u guys use? i am using Adobe Photoshop 7.0, izzit good enough? i cant seem to get the quality like u guys
    Last edited by nivlaOof; 15th May 2007 at 12:16 PM.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Quote Originally Posted by nivlaOof View Post
    Hi guys,
    juz like to find out from u guys wat image quality do u guys used? does it make a huge diff between those choices?

    Wat software do u guys use? i am using Adobe Photoshop 7.0, izzit good enough? i cant seem to get the quality like u guys
    image quality is up to you to choose, its depend how big u want.

    software, is it really needed? most people get out very good quality picture with PP at all, which is the quality are you talking about? PS7 more then enough, but do you know how to use it?


    Quote Originally Posted by nivlaOof View Post
    and BTW wat is the different btw Raw and JPEG?
    Check the internet

  3. #3

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Use the best image quality

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hong Kong, Pokfulam
    Posts
    1,157

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    always fine quality.. memory cards are cheap and large enough nowadays without having to switch to std quality jpg files.
    Canon 300D, 30D, 5D. 17-40 f4 L, 24-105 f4 L, 70-200 f2.8 L IS

  5. #5
    Senior Member zoossh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    8,725

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Quote Originally Posted by nivlaOof View Post
    Hi guys,
    juz like to find out from u guys wat image quality do u guys used? does it make a huge diff between those choices?
    and BTW wat is the different btw Raw and JPEG?

    Wat software do u guys use? i am using Adobe Photoshop 7.0, izzit good enough? i cant seem to get the quality like u guys
    use raw if you intend to edit them now or in future (when skills better), such as memorable trips (such as going north korea once in a lifetime). otherwise consider jpeg fine large and expand on storage abilities.

    quality is not dependent on type of software.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Quote Originally Posted by nivlaOof View Post
    Hi guys,
    juz like to find out from u guys wat image quality do u guys used? does it make a huge diff between those choices?
    and BTW wat is the different btw Raw and JPEG?

    Wat software do u guys use? i am using Adobe Photoshop 7.0, izzit good enough? i cant seem to get the quality like u guys
    What do you mean you can't get the quality? Most of the images posted here are resized so they are much smaller than what the camera gives, even the worse quality used would be able to give the same quality if you resized it down.

    Would it be a case of garbage in garbage out?

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    588

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    i shoot in RAW. i think it just gives more post processing flexibility.
    5D | 24-70L | 28mm f/1.8 | 580EX

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Woodlands
    Posts
    765

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Raw + L (fine)...
    Raw so that pp is possible, and L in case I do not have time to pp, I still have the jpegs. Easy choice except for the memory space used.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    RAW rocks.

    Even with wrong WB can correct very nicely with not much problems.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    with really good programs like lightroom, theres not really any good reason to shoot jpeg if u have raw capability.. its so fast to just process files..

  11. #11
    Member nivlaOof's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    little.RED.dot
    Posts
    1,102

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    I guess i need more practice on the Photoshop 7.0, still unfamiliar with the function. BTW so raw image is the original image and JPEG is like prepocessed? m i rite to say that?
    we cant pp JPEG image??

  12. #12

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Quote Originally Posted by nivlaOof View Post
    I guess i need more practice on the Photoshop 7.0, still unfamiliar with the function. BTW so raw image is the original image and JPEG is like prepocessed? m i rite to say that?
    we cant pp JPEG image??
    you can PP jpeg, but harder to resuce

  13. #13
    Member nivlaOof's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    little.RED.dot
    Posts
    1,102

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Quote Originally Posted by ihub88 View Post
    you can PP jpeg, but harder to resuce
    rescue? wat do u mean by that? sorry if i sound silly here

  14. #14
    Senior Member zac08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East
    Posts
    11,755

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    Quote Originally Posted by nivlaOof View Post
    rescue? wat do u mean by that? sorry if i sound silly here
    With RAW, you have more latitude to correct problems like exposure, WB, sharpness, etc... With Jpeg, it's already compressed to a small file size and as such, you can't recover much details from certain areas as opposed to a RAW picture of the same scene.

    Try it and you'll understand more.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    碧山
    Posts
    236

    Default Re: Wat image quality do u guys used?

    I started using raw half a year ago and never look back. It may take more time to process the photos but I find that I have better control in processing makes shooting raw quite attractive
    Canon 500D | Tamron 17-50 2.8, EF 28-135 IS USM, EF 50 1.8, Sigma 70-300 APO DG | 430EX | Flickr

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •