Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro opinion needed

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    20

    Default Re: Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro opinion needed

    Have take this pic with a/m lens under bright sunlight.




  2. #22

    Default Re: Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro opinion needed

    Quote Originally Posted by jmmtn4aj View Post
    PPed? Camera settings? Do you use the optimize image feature?
    contrast was obviously up-ed. settings as stated in post. D50 has no optimize image feature.

    hope that helps!

  3. #23

    Default Re: Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro opinion needed

    Quote Originally Posted by renegade150 View Post
    D50 has no optimize image feature.
    I wonder what I've been using on my D50 then

  4. #24

    Default Re: Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro opinion needed

    Quote Originally Posted by jmmtn4aj View Post
    I wonder what I've been using on my D50 then
    did u mean the 1 for imaging? sry..thought u were talking abt the new one in the D80..
    i've used both..so i was confused.

  5. #25

    Default Re: Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro opinion needed

    which is better? sigma or tamron 70-300?
    PM me if U Want Asst Wedding Photographer
    http://totoro17.multiply.com http://chinhaven.tripod.com

  6. #26

    Default Re: Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 APO DG Macro opinion needed

    Quote Originally Posted by totoro17 View Post
    which is better? sigma or tamron 70-300?
    personally, i think the only really excellent things about these lenses are the focal length, aperture and especially, price. for a fair quality super telephoto lens real cheap, i would recommend this lens
    however, if u have enough $$ to spare, i would say the nikon 70-300 f/4-5.6 VR would be nice, and the vr an added touch, towards the 300mm end. picture quality is better and sharper. also heard that the canon 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS is also good.
    then again, if you had even more $$$$$$$, there's always the 70-200 f/2.8 IS/VR

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •