Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: VR or F2.8

  1. #21

    Default Re: VR or F2.8

    the 80-200 f2.8 already weighs a ton, imagine 18-200 f2.8 VR. gosh, you need a tripod just to hold it up straight man because your arms will start to shiver after an entire day of luggin that lens around..

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Volcano Land

    Default Re: VR or F2.8

    I can imagine it to be slightly smaller if not around the same size as the Sigma 200-500/2.8

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts