![]() |
|
|||||||
| Others All other makes/brands/DIY & misc photographic gadgets discussed here. |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 63
|
hi all
I recently bought an 'imitation' omni-bounce type diffuser to use on my Nikon SB600 flash. This is the type that sits firmly on the end of the flash head. WHen I use this diffuser I'm finding that the photos I take (indoors) are too bright (and too 'white') and the shadows are more harsh. I have the flash head tilted forward just slightly from vertical. Even when I use the WB setting for 'flash', the photos turn out too white and too bright. I thought shadows and light should be better with the diffuser? Am I using it wrongly? Do I need to use a different flash-head angle, and/or change camera settings? many thanks Satz |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 卧龙岗
Posts: 2,660
|
http://www.stofen.com/FAQ/index.htm
it should work like the original stofen. just my 0.02.. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 63
|
mine's exactly like this:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Brand-New-Fla...QQcmdZViewItem except, of course, for Nikon SB600 thanks satz |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,793
|
the Omni Bounce is to tilt 60° when use in indoor, Omni Bounce itself does not soften the light, it spread the light into omni direction, so the light bounce up, left and right before reach the subjects, and the subjects have softer light and shadows.
please note that you flash will use up more power when using omnibounce, but TTL will take care of exposure, and you need to use bigger f-stop or go close to prevent underexpose due to out of range of flash power. WB has nothing to do with exposure. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 63
|
what I have found is almost the opposite...
when I am using the diffuser, the shadows are stronger...and the light is harsher and brighter (without any adjustment to camera) The light is also whiter / colder! |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,793
|
direct flash? ceiling bounce? bounce card? the material of your "'imitation' omni-bounce type diffuser" will have effect on the WB, it is just like a filter for the flash, changes the color of the light. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 63
|
hi
Quote: satz24 what I have found is almost the opposite... when I am using the diffuser, the shadows are stronger...and the light is harsher and brighter (without any adjustment to camera) The light is also whiter / colder! ....in comparison to 'bare' flash (without any addon) bounced at same angle (45deg and also approx 80 deg) how does one correctly do a white balance for a flash? I can't use a WB card thanks |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,793
|
but if you use the omnibounce, some of the light travel direct to the subjects, since the light travel direct are stronger, so the colder/neutral color of the light is dominating. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 63
|
thanks for that info, "catchlights"
I guess the only way to accurately WB (on my D50) using the omnibounce, is using PS? cheers satz |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Leave it on AWB I guess, or shoot RAW.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 113
|
just a question..newbie here...does the external flash 'knows' that the angle the flash is tilted at? And even if it does, things do change if we attach a bounce card or a omni bounce. How do we compensate ? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,793
|
agreed with calebk, you may adjust + or - to fine tune the auto WB to your taste. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,793
|
however, since you are using bounce card or a omni bounce, the effective range of the flash has been shorten, so you may need to get closer to your subject or using bigger aperture or higher ISO to compensate the lost for flash power. hope this in not too confusing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 113
|
does that mean when i use a bounce card, i will not be able to use auto mode for the camera since all calculations wil be done automatically?what i normally do is to turn my camera to manual mode and set the shutter speed or aperture so that the picture is slightly over exposed by one or two 'bars' (when u look through the camera if you know what i mean). Is that correct? I think i am more confusing. thanks again! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,785
|
shouldn't it be underexpose? else you gonna end up with a overexposed image with/without flash... |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,793
|
so the flash does not know how far is the distance which the light has travel. but since you use bounce device on flash, the flash power cut down significantly, your flash have to work harder to get the same amount of exposure. in short, the range of the flash is reduce. sometime, i see people take a shot with flash, image turn out to be underexpose, instead of open up aperture, up ISO or go closer, they use + compensation on flash!! the flash has already deliver max power liao, still underexpose. add + compensation will not make the flash deliver more power than max!!
Last edited by catchlights; 1st May 2007 at 01:28 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 113
|
hmm...since you mentioned that by using a bounce card or omni bounce would reduce the flash power since light is dispersed, the picture would be underexposed since the flash would 'think' that it is correct. By over exposing one or two 'bars' wouldn't it brighten up the picture back to the correct exposure? I mean the above scenario is used only for bounce cards or omni bounce.
if without using any bounce cards, then the flash would correctly expose pictures right? Thanks again! |
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Punggol
Posts: 10,793
|
for example, you want to flash to deliver flash light at the exposure of f8, as long you stay with 1.5m ~15m, the flash will give you f8, cos the sensor read the exposure on the subject and output enough amount of light to reach f8. but if you use bounce device on flash, the flash will still give you f8, but instead of 15m, maybe cut down to 8m, so as long you still within the "new" working range, you are safe. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|