d2x, d200 & s5pro

[WeiKhuen]

You can view the pics of these 3 cameras at

http://www.flickr.com/photos/7138308...7600148703250/

My workflow :
open up raw converter (Capture Nx for Nikon, Finepix Studio for S5)
Nikon setting :
Mode 1
Tone : low contrast
saturation : Normal
white balance : direct sunlight
sharpness : off

s5 pro setting :
tone : org
sharpness : off
white balance : auto

I saved all three files to 16 bit tiff and then compare them in ps at 100%.

All these 3 pics were taken using the same len Nikon 17~35mm set at f8.

[dahaoren]

Bro, thank for sharing.Glad to shoot with u all this afternoon.

[dahaoren]

notice that S5's shots tends to be on the cool side. hmmm.... normal?

[u2nofear]

Are you comparing them with their color ? if yes ,I perfer your D2x, maybe i like more vivid, The detail and quality of pictures can't see any different, i think only expert can tell the difference . My D200 can't differentiable purple and blue, does S5pro better ? can share your opinions thanks...

[photobum]

Originally Posted by u2nofear Are you comparing them with their color ? if yes ,I perfer your D2x, maybe i like more vivid, The detail and quality of pictures can't see any different, i think only expert can tell the difference . My D200 can't differentiable purple and blue, does S5pro better ? can share your opinions thanks...

Images taken from any Nikon DSLR seems to inherit this ugly orange cast. It is not 'vivid' like you said. Most of the time, I have to neutralize the color in Adobe Lightroom and Adobe Photoshop.

[ExplorerZ]

not sure, but i think some diagonal lines from the S5 ain't as smooth as those from d200/d2x (especially on the center leaf)
probably due to interpolation?

[bernstein1234]

Originally Posted by dahaoren notice that S5's shots tends to be on the cool side. hmmm.... normal?

As with most fuji cameras pictures tend to appear bland and undynamic - but a bit of PP will do the trick