![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the little black dot
Posts: 25
|
Hi all...
'm wondering since the price gap between D200 & D80 is kinda close... Should i get the former even though i'm a amateur at DSLR? Or if i did get D200, i know it is without kit lens. So are there any 18-135mm lens for it? No matter 3rd party or Nikon... But is it expensive, if yes then should i might as well get 18-200 mm for walkabout? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Legion
Posts: 6,786
|
do consider again... the price ain't really that close(to me...) d200 is going at 2.1k? and d80 is going at 1.4k+ without kit lens, the different is $700...
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 590
|
do u need 5fps, MF lens metering, RGB1005, weather seal, metal body?
if not than get the d80 |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the little black dot
Posts: 25
|
The 5fps would be used...
I dunnoe about the MF lens metering... The RGB1005 for D200 and RGB 450 for D80.... Does it make any obvious difference to the end product?.. Weather seal - ya.... Will go different climate/temperature countries Metal body - I read about what metal if dropped would dented but not broken.. Then the plastic when dropped, if never break then also not dented...??? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: west side!
Posts: 685
|
maybe u can start off with wat's ur budget?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 590
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 996
|
You're much better off with a moderately priced body and an excellent lens, than a high end body and a cheap kit lens.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: big tree town
Posts: 1,653
|
since TS is thinking about D200 and D80, i guess the D80 is a better choice. IMHO, when dealing with DSLRs, lenses are more often impt then ur camera body. The D200 needs someone who know its true value to use it. D80 is very good for amateur already (somemore got auto mode). Just my bit of input. ![]()
__________________
cameras are not made of tofu |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Clementi
Posts: 10,476
|
Some of the predictable things that may happen if you get a D200 as your first cam are i) you carry it for awhile, then complain it's too heavy, so after awhile it sits in your drycab. ii) you carry it for awhile, then complain it's too heavy, so you sell it, at a loss, to get a lighter, smaller body. For starting off, the D80 should be more than enough. You haven't told us i) What you shoot ii) What you exactly need from the camera and why iii) Whether you have prior experience with an SLR of any sort. And as Explorerz mentioned, the price gap is deceiving. For a D80 kit, it's 1.8k or thereabouts. However, because most shops are offering the D200 as a body only, for about $2.2k, you should be comparing with the D80's body only price: $1.4k |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,574
|
, shuttercount=$$$ .So you don't need MF lens metering.. The metering doesn't make much of a difference. People survived 30+ years with just centreweight average metering. I also bring D70s to different climate/temperature countries and it works fine, but the question is are you going to subject the camera to things like splashes/sand storm etc? If not, weather seal is not that important. D70s works fine when I shoot under a light drizzle/snow, just got to wipe it dry before the water seeps in. Metal body = heavy! Bottomline is what you're going to use it for, how often you're going to use it etc.. Calebk has put up a series of questions which will help us understand your needs and make better suggestions. ![]() Last edited by lsisaxon; 24th April 2007 at 10:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hougang
Posts: 1,039
|
buy the best you can afford. D200 price and performance is, to me, great value.
Along with 5ps and faster write speed, you have High speed flash sync and manual lens compatibility. I use manual lenses so the manual capability is crucial. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,610
|
do consider getting a used D200 (I think the going rate now is $1700 to $1,900)...which is a better than a brand new D80 at $1.4K, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 76
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pasir Ris, Singapore
Posts: 115
|
Buy what you can afford, but don't buy the D200 if you are going to cut into the budget for your lenses.
Remember that lenses will last you many more years than the camera body. Further, the D200 is a lot less forgiving when paired with a poor lens. It's a quality body that demands quality lenses.
__________________
http://rajeshs.smugmug.com |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 321
|
The term amateur in photography is very misleading. When someone says he's an amateur doesn't mean he is a newbie but just that he doesn't take photographs for a living. I've seen lots of amateur shots that can take your breath away, some better than a number of pros.
If you're new to photography, the correct term should be beginner. For lens, 18-135 is a kit lens for the D80, while the 18-200 is a VR lens, price is very different. For a single walkabout lens, both are good enough, but of course the VR lets you do more (better) handheld shots at lower speeds. For camera body, I think its quite safe to say the D80 is a higher end entry level body while the D200 is a lower end pro level. Either way, go have a feel for both bodies before making a decision; that way you'll know which body suits you better (budget aside). Using a body that doesn't suite you will not bring out the best in your photos cos you probably will be bitching conciously or subconciously when taking a shot. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Advertiser
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 91120589
Posts: 4,874
|
Go to a shop try.
Get a feel before deciding. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 216
|
Having "played" hifi for a few years, it taught me a dear lesson on the costs of upgrading equipments.
Before I made any purchase, I would always ask myself what's the budget I have and the max limit that I can stretch to. For instance, I would be considering D80 vs D200. Then, I would read up enough, both reviews and user comments to understand the difference between the two. I would then proceed to try out both and look out for advantages and disadvantages. Next, I would ask myself if I can live with the "disadvantages" for the next one to two year. If I can get pass that stage, I will purchase that camera. If not, I will just end up losing more money by going along the upgrade path. As for lenses, I always tell myself that I shall purchase one good lens once a year, targeting 17-35mm, 28-70mm and 70-200mm. I just need to be patience, that's all. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: EastEnders
Posts: 566
|
Get D80 & use the 'extra' $700 or so to add to budget for better lens ... 17-55 + 55-200 / 70-200?
![]()
__________________
D700|D300|20-35 f2.8|24-70 f2.8|80-200 f2.8|18-200VR|17-35 f2.8-4|Toki 100mm f2.8 Macro| |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 361
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|