![]() |
|
|||||||
| Four Thirds Standard (4/3 and m43) Four Thirds and Micro Four Thirds Discussions |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Choa Chu Kang
Posts: 496
|
Hi, are there any more compatible and reasonably priced external flashes that E-500 can use besides FL-36 and FL-50??
Heard a lot of negative feedback from friends regarding FL-36. Anyone using this flash care to give any feedbacks? Looking to get an external flash, and so far, only FL-36 is within my budget. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,690
|
The FL-36 works fine within it's limitations.
Of course you cannot machine gun with it; no small flash can anyway.
__________________
www.facebook.com/darrengyh |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Choa Chu Kang
Posts: 496
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe, Sweden, outside Lund
Posts: 2,038
|
I think it is very unfair to say that the FL-36 is not good. It may be slow in charge but it should be very good if used within it's limits. Yes, it is less powerful than the FL-50 but it has all the same features, which you will not get if you buy a third party flash. I am thinking of the followings:
1. - Red AF assist light as one major 2. - Super FP mode. Very 3. - TTL mode. Both normal and Super FP TTL. Maybe there are other important points also but those three above are the ones I immediately came up with. Some ppl say TTL mode is not good and they are both right and wrong. Yes, you can live without but it is there, it works, so it is useful. If you absolutely want a "third party" I would say Olympus T32. Old, but in terms of power it is compatibel with FL-50 since it is actually made for film cameras. It uses four AA size batteries, very fast in recharge time and actually works fine up to 1/250s shutter speed even if it has an official sync speed of 1/60. I guess that is based on the lack of precision some cameras had during the 1980's when the flash was designed. My personal experience shows that it works down to 1/250. I have five different flashes apart from the FL-50 and the T32 is by far the best after the FL-50 in my opinion. Anyway, what you have to look out for is the trigger voltage. Not all flashes have low trigger and modern cameras are designed for low voltage. In my opinion any high GN flash with four 1.5V batteries should be faster in charge than any flash with only two batteries. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,013
|
For a flash with GN36, nothing really beats this little gem for its value, accuracy and effectiveness. If you need more power and faster recycling time, then you are left with the FL50. There has been much discussions in the past within these sections (Oympus and Four Thirds) that has discussed the FL-36 and FL-50. Might want to dig into those threads and read through them. They should give you a much better idea of which would be the one you should invest your money in...
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,460
|
Let's start from basics...you can use ANY flash you want that will fit into the hot shoe with regards to trigger voltage not being over 24v (a 2AA flash can have a trigger voltage over 200volts) and non-compatible TTL flashes (Canon, Nikon, older Olympus flashes for film cameras and older digital like the FL-40).
There are three types of flashes, manual, automatic, and TTL...with manual and automatic flashes you have to set a shutter speed under 1/180th and use the chart on the back of the flash to determine the aperture setting...IOW you have to use Manual mode on the camera and do all the setting yourself. With TTL the flash and camera talk to each other...when you change a setting on the camera the flash will compensate, and vice-versa. Also with the FL-36/50 there's also automatic zooming of the flash when you zoom the lens, and also when focusing in lowlight the FL-36/50 will also emit a red glow to help the camera focus (rather than the strobing that's done by the internal flash). Just a note that other brands TTL (Canon & Nikon) are NOT compatible with Olympus TTL...also older TTL flashes like the FL-40 and those made for film cameras (like the G40, T20, T32, etc.) are also NOT compabile with today's digital cameras. Personally I use the FL-36, and sometimes I add a Metz 34 CS-2 slave for fill for my portable shooting, but in studio I use monolights (these are a strobe combined with a halogen light in one unit connected to the camera via a PC (Pin-Circle) connector), or photofloods. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 544
|
The two are of different class. Look at the price and if FL-50 doesn't perform better than FL-36, then something is seriously wrong.
Having said that I am very happy with the FL-36. Fully charged batteries does help its recharging cycle. It is lighter and more compact and I do bring it out for use than keeping it at home. Like all olympus design, it might be slower, but it always get it correct (99.99% :> pls don't quote me) If recharge cycle is a key factor for you to get the shots, then give FL-36 a miss. (a 2 batteries operated flash is a 2 batteries operated flash...) |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 250
|
A flash worth looking at is Metz 44 Olympus version(I think is AFO??).This one support Super FP flash.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe, Sweden, outside Lund
Posts: 2,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Gallery Subscriber
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sinagpore
Posts: 849
|
Last edited by selamatlzh; 23rd April 2007 at 03:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 250
|
I mean this:http://www.metz.de/en/photo_electron..._AF-4.176.html .
44 AF-4 O for Olympus digital cameras: With TTL mode and "HSS" high-speed synchronisation from Metz site. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Gallery Subscriber
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sinagpore
Posts: 849
|
Too bad cannot meet you guys tonight otherwise I can show you. But they are older model which does not support TTL and FP. I own 44mz2 and 54mz4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,013
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Gallery Subscriber
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sinagpore
Posts: 849
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
New Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 9
|
I advise to buy Metz. More dearly than FL36, but it is cheaper and better FL50. Some models are completely compatible with E500.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,013
|
Maybe let's have a little shootout between the Metz and the FLs. Not to compare which is better, but more importantly, how does the Metz "stand against" the dedicated FLs on an Olympus camera. Just to make sure people can make up their mine when they are making purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe, Sweden, outside Lund
Posts: 2,038
|
YES, I HAVE A T32 AND THAT IS PERFECTLY SAFE TO USE WITH ANY CAMERA! Actually, I have even discussed the question with an Oly engineer here in Sweden and he assured me that ANY flash made by Olympus is safe to use on ANY Olympus dSLR. Since I only have the T32 I can not guarantee that he is right, but the T32 and the T20 are definitely safe. I only have the T32 but I have looked at the scematic diagram of T20 and can say that it is really a little broder of T32, just like FL-36 is to the FL-50. The T20 uses only 2 batteries but it has very similar triggering circuit and it has low trigger voltage. Please make a search on CS. The subject is discussed over and over again. Thank you. Last edited by OlyFlyer; 18th May 2007 at 03:57 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|