Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

  1. #1

    Default Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    I'm going on a 8 days trip next week to Sapa.
    Will be packing my 10-22, 24-105, CPL, GND 3.3 & 8, batt and CFs.

    Not sure if I should bring a tele over...
    It would be a trekking (carrying backpacks) trip. So will it be worthwhile bringing in the additional weight or will the 105mm end range suffice?

    First time going to Sapa, need advice on how "photo friendly" are the locals if you go up to them for a portraiture shot.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    west side!
    Posts
    725

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    u mean sapa, vietnam rite?
    and the sigma 100-300mm lens?

    i think bringing it would be cool. heavy but useful for certain shots.
    but then again, it's no big lost if you dun bring. the 100-300 is no travel lens and at the extreme tele end, u need to set up a tripod ... no much point lah.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Legion
    Posts
    7,751

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    depends on what tele lens you talking about.. if it is not too heavy, why not?
    otherwise can try to compromise by using a TC with your 24-105...
    on my recent trip i used a 2x tc on my 28-75.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    Quote Originally Posted by tribal.snake View Post
    u mean sapa, vietnam rite?
    and the sigma 100-300mm lens?

    i think bringing it would be cool. heavy but useful for certain shots.
    but then again, it's no big lost if you dun bring. the 100-300 is no travel lens and at the extreme tele end, u need to set up a tripod ... no much point lah.
    Yes, Sapa Vietnam.
    The lens I have within this range are 70~200 f/2.8L IS and 70~300 APO Sigma.
    The f/2.8 seems to be heavy and bulky for the stealth reporter 300AW... (will be bringing a shoulder bag as I'm carrying my clothes in a bagpack) and I'm thinking if I should bring the Sigma instead.

    Will not be bringing tripod / monopod as it's too heavy for the journey and too much baggage for trekking.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    Quote Originally Posted by ExplorerZ View Post
    depends on what tele lens you talking about.. if it is not too heavy, why not?
    otherwise can try to compromise by using a TC with your 24-105...
    on my recent trip i used a 2x tc on my 28-75.
    Much as I like to, I don't have a TC...
    Don't think i'll buy one as I'm not the "tele" type and it's costly.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    270 degree of Singapore
    Posts
    6,741

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    For trekking trip, I think better don't bring, it's really taxing your back & you may not use that frequent to justify it, unless you are birder type .
    Sony Alpha 700 hobbyist

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Legion
    Posts
    7,751

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoky View Post
    Much as I like to, I don't have a TC...
    Don't think i'll buy one as I'm not the "tele" type and it's costly.
    erm ic, maybe 70-300 would do fine if you can take the extra weight (about 500g)
    as for me I use my TC as a "tele" and also get me better "macro" ability.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    A village in a forest
    Posts
    1,515

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    If it is a trekking trip and you don't intend to bring a monopod/tripod, I'll say leave your telephoto lenses at home. You'll wouldn't want to be half-dead carrying that extra weight for a lens that you may use 1 or 2 times only.
    Canon 80D|Panasonic LX3/LX5
    35f2 IS|50f1.8|85f1.8|12-24f4|18-135f4-5.6 IS|28-75f2.8

  9. #9

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    Thanks for everyones' advice.
    I'll leave the 70-200 / 300 home then.

    Looking at the overall weight, 1/2 kg is a lot.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoky View Post
    Thanks for everyones' advice.
    I'll leave the 70-200 / 300 home then.

    Looking at the overall weight, 1/2 kg is a lot.
    Actually, the 70-300 is quite a light outdoor lens. If you have good day light, can use esp for street photography. But once indoors, it's useless.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    Quote Originally Posted by midicity View Post
    Actually, the 70-300 is quite a light outdoor lens. If you have good day light, can use esp for street photography. But once indoors, it's useless.
    Well, the thought of it "hunting" for focus kinds of put me off at times, especially when u want to take candid shots of people before u get their attention.

    Also, seems like every gram counts when it comes to long hrs trekking daily.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    A village in a forest
    Posts
    1,515

    Default Re: Worthwhile bringing 100~300mm range overseas?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoky View Post
    Also, seems like every gram counts when it comes to long hrs trekking daily.
    Yeap. The longer you walk, the bigger the difference you'll feel for each gram added....
    Canon 80D|Panasonic LX3/LX5
    35f2 IS|50f1.8|85f1.8|12-24f4|18-135f4-5.6 IS|28-75f2.8

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •