![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 311
|
2 pictures to share. I was at the zoo sometime ago and I thought there are two 'fly' that looks interesting.. Which one do you like better?
DA21 f3.2 1/60sec ISO800 ![]() Vivitar S-1 @210 f4 1/160sec ISO800 ![]() cheersss... |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
Your sensor needs cleaning
Below the left wings. IMHO DA21 is not ideal for macro For dragon fly needs f8-f13 and try get better focus on the eyes. (typical macro comment )If this is 1st attempt with macro then good try, if not you'll need more practise. (Same goes for myself) ![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 311
|
haaa... i wasnt doing any macro shooting.. Just so happened to see these 2 'fly' thingy.
camera body no SR, so there is a limitation on how much f/stop i can handheld with it. ya,.. its time to clean the sensor. cheerss.. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 640
|
Like the sharpness from your Series 1 or was it heavy PP? Amazingly sharp at ISO800
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 219
|
I like the dragon fly.. the wings are very sharp. S1 is a nice lens.
Er... the fly not so nice leh... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bukit Gombak
Posts: 9,105
|
Nice attempts, especially the dragonfly. The first one is abit messy on the background, but I guess you liked the scene, and that's why we buy our cameras for - to record the interesting and great moments
BTW, there are several versions of S1 70-210, which one(s) do you have ? Just curious. I had the second version (70-210/3.5 by Tokina, 62mm filter size, not the very first one by Kiron which has 67mm front thread size), quite a nice lens. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 311
|
The one i have is the third version on this page: http://www.robertstech.com/vivitar.htm
70-210mm f/2.8-f/4 62mm filter size. Remarkably sharp glass but lack of warm color rendering compared to SMC glass. I had used this lens to do some indoor concert shoot and the result really surprise me when I view it on the computer screen. Like what Longko said, it will be good if I can stop down it a little more. But at that situation, I can't do it without the use of tripod. Having a SR body will be good in such case.. slacker: what is consider heavy PP?? is 1-pass of sharpening consider heavy? i don't know what else to do in PP, i'm not good in PP... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 640
|
Did manage to saw one S1 in one of the shop but i never asked about it since i have got one non-S1 70-210 Vivitar to play with. And on the PP part, i ain good in anything myself as well. Imagine i do not even understand what USM means till longko enlightened me on it. Just so amazed by the sharpness on the pattern of the dragonfly's wing that make me thought you might drive the sharpness to the max when you PP. Now with this picture, you make me truely understand the legend... Thanks man! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Balestier
Posts: 2,057
|
I'll love to see the one from Kiron. It is said to be one of the best zoom lens made.
![]()
__________________
Reason to mean photographers http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...axon/WTD03.gif |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SG
Posts: 640
|
ahhhh.. .tips from the macro bugs magnet!
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|