Side by Side Test shots AF-S 80 200, AF-D 80-200 and 80-400 to AF-S 70-200 VR

[c_jit]

If someone already post this, just ignore it.

1. Test Images 70-200 2.8 AFS VR with D1x
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...VR70200V1.html

2. Compare Image 70-200 2.8 AFS VR with 80-200 AFS on a D100 body
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...vr70200v2.html

3. Compare Images 70-200 2.8 AFS VR with 80-200 AFS and 80-200 AF-D on a F100 body and Sensia 100 reversal film.
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...vr70200v3.html


4. Compare Images 70-200 2.8 AFS VR with 80-200 AFS on a F100 body and Sensia 100
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...r70200v3b.html

5. Compare Images 70-200 2.8 AFS VR and various Fixed Lenses from 85 to 200
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...vr70200v5.html


6. Compare Images 70-200 + TC20E II ¡Ñº 80-400 VR
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...vr70200v4.html

Enjoy,

[kingpin]

Useful comparisons. Wah english is real tough to read. Think its a conversion from French. Original reports in French?
Looks like the AFS 70-200 VR is a real performer even with the TC20E it seems to beat AF 80-400 VR at the long end. Seems to be slightly inferior to the AFS 80-200 but has an advantage of going to smaller apertures in low light with the VR. Impressive.

[Viewfinder]

thks for the links

[pcman]

Agreed

Quote: Originally posted by kingpin Useful comparisons. Wah english is real tough to read. Think its a conversion from French. Original reports in French? Looks like the AFS 70-200 VR is a real performer even with the TC20E it seems to beat AF 80-400 VR at the long end. Seems to be slightly inferior to the AFS 80-200 but has an advantage of going to smaller apertures in low light with the VR. Impressive.