Let light be shed on what exactly we critique on.
i've been confused by the standard critique technique... Are there any standard guideline in the first place to critique a photograph?
My reason for this thread, is infact fairly simple and straight forward. I've seen posting in critique corner, which reads...
.... too soft...
.... very OOF...
.... sharpen alittle... and it just goes on.
What exactly should a "judge", judge? Shouldn't the basic of composition be touched on first before we start to pin-point the finer and more complex issues like listed above?
Now before you click reply, to start flaming me. Please be kind
Disclaimer: NO pun had been intended during the creation of this thread, I am NOT against any forumer.