|
|
12th March 2003
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 94
|
AF Zoom-Nikkor 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6D IF
Anyone use or own this lens?.....thinking of getting it as a general purpose outdoor lens for my use...any comments or advice on this lense?
Last edited by Kaprikon; 12th March 2003 at 08:56 PM. |
|
|
12th March 2003
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,149
|
hmm ... my first lens for my photography ... it's a mutli purpose lens ... i use it for sch concert and also for outdoor ... the lens is great in term of zoom range n pics quality ~ well the main drawback is that it is a slowwwwwwwwwwwww lens ... and i mean it ....
 |
|
|
|
12th March 2003
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 94
|
hmm....okie....anymore?
Last edited by Kaprikon; 12th March 2003 at 10:07 PM. |
|
|
| Sponsored Link |
|
|
|
12th March 2003
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Behind a lens
Posts: 2,382
|
I read that this lens is not made by nikon themselves..
Done by a certain 3rd party len.. Anyone can confirm?
__________________
Visit my Homepage if you have time. Comments appreciated. |
|
|
|
13th March 2003
|
#5 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
13th March 2003
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,799
|
 If want a 28-200mm range, I would rather go for the 1 million proven Tamron version. |
|
|
|
|
13th March 2003
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
14th March 2003
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Singapore
Posts: 94
|
cathy quote me $745 a few days ago....and i have no plans to buy any more lens soon after this one....not after i'm 'done' with it anyway
|
|
|
|
19th March 2003
|
#9 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West
Posts: 6,689
|
if you are going to spend $745 on this, you will be better off getting a better lens at that price or getting the Tamron 28-200XR which only costs less than half of it, ie $350. By getting Nikon, you extinguished one fo the advantages of 28-200s, ie that its cheap n value for the price.
at $745, u'd prob be better off getting one of those "proper" lenses hehe. Cheers! |
|
|
|
20th March 2003
|
#10 |
|
Deregistered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asylum, Ward 4444
Posts: 2,132
|
How about if it was compared to a Tokina 24-200mm?
 |
|
|
|
27th March 2003
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,410
|
Just to inform you guys... there will be a revised version of this 28-200, coming out at the same time with the 24-120 AF-S G VR....
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
